Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;22(2):171-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1253-7. Epub 2010 Sep 7.

Ringing the changes in evaluation of urogenital prolapse

Affiliations

Ringing the changes in evaluation of urogenital prolapse

Sushma Srikrishna et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Feb.

Erratum in

  • Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2011 Jul;22(7):901

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Some women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) have occult urodynamic stress incontinence (OUSI) and might develop incontinence after POP surgery. Our aim was to determine predictive value of ring pessary test during urodynamics in identifying patients with OUSI, likely to develop stress urinary incontinence (SUI) postoperatively.

Methods: Women with POP were recruited from surgical lists. All underwent preoperative videocystourethrography (VCU). Women with normal VCUs had tests repeated after pessary reduction of POP.

Results: One hundred and twelve women were studied. Forty-eight women had "normal" VCU. Of these, 43 had no OUSI and only 1/43 developed SUI postoperatively. Five women had OUSI and 2/5 developed frank SUI. The pessary test had poor sensitivity (67%) but high specificity (93%) in predicting postoperative SUI. Positive predictive value was low (40%), with an excellent negative predictive value (98%).

Conclusion: This test can identify patients likely to remain continent following surgery and be a valuable tool in preoperative counselling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;182(6):1378-81 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;104(4):795-800 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 2002 Jun;59(6):856-60 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):795-806 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources