Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Nov;39(6):704-10.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq096. Epub 2010 Sep 7.

A multicentre randomised controlled trial of day hospital-based falls prevention programme for a screened population of community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls

Simon Conroy  1 , Denise Kendrick, Rowan Harwood, John Gladman, Carol Coupland, Tracey Sach, Avril Drummond, Jane Youde, Judi Edmans, Tahir Masud
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A multicentre randomised controlled trial of day hospital-based falls prevention programme for a screened population of community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls

Simon Conroy et al. Age Ageing. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: to determine the clinical effectiveness of a day hospital-delivered multifactorial falls prevention programme, for community-dwelling older people at high risk of future falls identified through a screening process.

Design: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Setting: eight general practices and three day hospitals based in the East Midlands, UK.

Participants: three hundred and sixty-four participants, mean age 79 years, with a median of three falls risk factors per person at baseline.

Interventions: a day hospital-delivered multifactorial falls prevention programme, consisting of strength and balance training, a medical review and a home hazards assessment.

Main outcome measure: rate of falls over 12 months of follow-up, recorded using self-completed monthly diaries.

Results: one hundred and seventy-two participants in each arm contributed to the primary outcome analysis. The overall falls rate during follow-up was 1.7 falls per person-year in the intervention arm compared with 2.0 falls per person-year in the control arm. The stratum-adjusted incidence rate ratio was 0.86 (95% CI 0.73-1.01), P = 0.08, and 0.73 (95% CI 0.51-1.03), P = 0.07 when adjusted for baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control arms in any secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: this trial did not conclusively demonstrate the benefit of a day hospital-delivered multifactorial falls prevention programme, in a population of older people identified as being at high risk of a future fall.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of participants through the trial. FPP, falls prevention programme.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;2 CD007146; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub2. - PubMed
    1. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC. Rethinking individual and community fall prevention strategies: a meta-regression comparing single and multifactorial interventions. Age Ageing. 2007;36:656–62. doi:10.1093/ageing/afm122. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Falls: The Assessment and Prevention of Falls in Older People. NICE, London; 2004. - PubMed
    1. Lamb S, Gates S, Fisher J, Cooke M, Carter Y, McCabe C. Scoping Exercise on Fallers’ Clinics: National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO). 2007.
    1. Nandy S, Parsons S, Cryer C, Underwood M. Development and preliminary examination of the predictive validity of the Falls Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT) for use in primary care. J Public Health. 2004;26:138–43. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdh132. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms