Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Sep;12(9):685-96.
doi: 10.1593/neo.10610.

Evolving role of bone biomarkers in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Affiliations
Review

Evolving role of bone biomarkers in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Janet E Brown et al. Neoplasia. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

The preferential metastasis of prostate cancer cells to bone disrupts the process of bone remodeling and results in lesions that cause significant pain and patient morbidity. Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is an established biomarker in prostate cancer, it provides only limited information relating to bone metastases and the treatment of metastatic bone disease with bisphosphonates or novel noncytotoxic targeted or biological agents that may provide clinical benefits without affecting PSA levels. As bone metastases develop, factors derived from bone metabolism are released into blood and urine, including N- and C-terminal peptide fragments of type 1 collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, which represent potentially useful biomarkers for monitoring metastatic bone disease. A number of clinical trials have investigated these bone biomarkers with respect to their diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive values. Results suggest that higher levels of bone biomarkers are associated with an increased risk of skeletal-related events and/or death. As a result of these findings, bone biomarkers are now being increasingly used as study end points, particularly in studies investigating novel agents with putative bone effects. Data from prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the use of bone biomarkers and to confirm that marker levels provide additional information beyond traditional methods of response evaluation for patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The vicious cycle of bone metastases (reproduced and adapted from Guise et al. [121], with permission from the American Association for Cancer Research). The production of cytokines and growth factors by tumor cells, particularly parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTH-rP), stimulates osteoblasts to produce RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclastogenesis that is inhibited by OPG. In turn, osteoclast-mediated bone resorption releases growth factors, such as transforming growth factor β, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), which promote tumor growth [9,10]. Osteoblast and osteoclast activity results in the release of proteins, protein fragments, or mineral components directly involved in bone structure or metabolism into the blood and urine. Biomarkers of bone formation include BAP, PICP/PINP, and OC. Biomarkers of bone resorption include CTX/NTX, PYD, and DPD; ICTP; BSP; and TRACP5b.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modulation of NTX in patients with metastatic CRPC after treatment with novel therapies. (A) Percentage change in uNTX during weeks 1 to 25 in patients treated with denosumab or zoledronic acid, demonstrating rapid denosumab-induced suppression of bone resorption (reprinted from Fizazi et al. [97], Copyright 2009, with permission from Elsevier). (B) Waterfall plot of maximal percentage change in uNTX from baseline in patients treated with 70 or 100mg of dasatinib twice daily. Of 41 patients, 33 (80%) had a decrease in uNTX while on study (reproduced and adapted from Yu et al. [90], with permission from the American Association for Cancer Research). (C) Percentage change in uNTX during weeks 1 to 12 in patients treated with atrasentan or atrasentan plus zoledronic acid. Mean serum NTX increased by 32.4% ± 14.5% with atrasentan and decreased by 34.4% ± 6.9% in the combination group (P < .001; reproduced and adapted from Michaelson et al. [87], with permission from John Wiley and Sons).

References

    1. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:581–592. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. - PubMed
    1. Sternberg CN. Systemic chemotherapy and new experimental approaches in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:vii91–vii95. - PubMed
    1. Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, Morris M, Sternberg CN, Carducci MA, Eisenberger MA, Higano C, Bubley GJ, Dreicer R, et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1148–1159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bubendorf L, Schopfer A, Wagner U, Sauter G, Moch H, Willi N, Gasser TC, Mihatsch MJ. Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:578–583. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances