Pulpal studies: biocompatibility or effectiveness of marginal seal?
- PMID: 2082408
Pulpal studies: biocompatibility or effectiveness of marginal seal?
Abstract
Standards presently used to evaluate the biologic compatibility of dental restorative materials are examined and their inherent shortcomings are noted in this report. Studies citing the alleged effects of dental materials on the pulp are reviewed and compared to new theories, which suggest that the principal cause of pulpal inflammation is bacterial infiltration. Thus, studies that are not able to exclude bacteria as a variable cannot be used to draw conclusions as to the cause of inflammatory changes. This paper presents a proposal to alter the current biocompatibility testing methods to methods that can distinguish between the effects of materials and the effects of bacteria on the pulp.
Similar articles
-
Pulpal response to a new light-cured composite placed in etched glass-ionomer lined cavities.Oper Dent. 1991 Jul-Aug;16(4):122-9. Oper Dent. 1991. PMID: 1805180
-
Biocompatibility of various dental materials: pulp healing with a surface seal.Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996 Jun;16(3):240-51. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996. PMID: 9084310
-
Biologic evaluation of filling materials. A comparison of results using cell culture techniques, implantation tests and pulp studies.Int Dent J. 1977 Jun 2;27(2):124-9. Int Dent J. 1977. PMID: 407166
-
Future directions in bonding resins to the dentine-pulp complex.J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Apr;31(4):385-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01258.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2004. PMID: 15089947 Review.
-
[Biocompatibility of crown and bridge materials. 1. Substances in contact with dentin].Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1989 Nov;44(11):822-5. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1989. PMID: 2700701 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Biocompatibility of composite resins.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011 Dec;8(Suppl 1):S21-9. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011. PMID: 23372592 Free PMC article.