Advocacy groups and their role in rare diseases research
- PMID: 20824463
- DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_28
Advocacy groups and their role in rare diseases research
Abstract
One of the remarkable and unique aspects of the recent history of rare disease research has been the evolving role of patient advocacy groups and the collaborative partnership that exists among such groups and the scientists who study rare diseases, as well as the government officials charged with overseeing medical research and regulatory processes. This collaboration, which in many respects developed out of necessity on all sides, is unparalleled in other areas of medical research and product development. It has played a significant role over the past 30 years in the adoption of public policies, available research funding and other factors affecting the general climate for research on rare diseases. Specific areas of interest include the adoption of the Orphan Drug Act in the U.S. in 1983 and subsequent similar legislation elsewhere in the world; the relationship of patient advocacy groups with government research funding and regulatory entities; the role of patient advocacy groups in seeking to "de-risk" orphan product development through initiatives such as facilitating patient registries and disease natural histories; the role of advocacy groups in ensuring that patients have access to treatments; and the increasing globalization of patient advocacy initiatives.
Similar articles
-
New and evolving rare diseases research programs at the National Institutes of Health.Public Health Genomics. 2013;16(6):259-67. doi: 10.1159/000355929. Epub 2014 Feb 3. Public Health Genomics. 2013. PMID: 24503586
-
Rare diseases, orphan drugs, and orphaned patients.Mol Interv. 2006 Aug;6(4):186-91. doi: 10.1124/mi.6.4.2. Mol Interv. 2006. PMID: 16960139 No abstract available.
-
Rare diseases research: expanding collaborative translational research opportunities.Chest. 2013 Jul;144(1):16-23. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0606. Chest. 2013. PMID: 23880676 Free PMC article.
-
Review of 11 national policies for rare diseases in the context of key patient needs.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Mar 31;12(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0618-0. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017. PMID: 28359278 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rare Diseases: Joining Mainstream Research and Treatment Based on Reliable Epidemiological Data.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:3-21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_1. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017. PMID: 29214563 Review.
Cited by
-
Public Engagement and Neurology: An Update.Brain Sci. 2021 Mar 28;11(4):429. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11040429. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 33800571 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Collecting rare diseases.F1000Res. 2014 Oct 31;3:260. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.5577.1. eCollection 2014. F1000Res. 2014. PMID: 25580231 Free PMC article.
-
The need for a next-generation public health response to rare diseases.Genet Med. 2016 Oct 27;19(5):489-490. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.166. Epub 2016 Oct 27. Genet Med. 2016. PMID: 27787501 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Advancing orphan drug development for rare diseases.Clin Exp Pediatr. 2024 Jul;67(7):356-357. doi: 10.3345/cep.2023.01109. Epub 2023 Nov 17. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 37986564 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Treating rare diseases with the cinema: Can popular movies enhance public understanding of rare diseases?Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Mar 5;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02269-x. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022. PMID: 35248134 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous