Small and large foetuses: Identification and estimation of foetal weight at delivery from third-trimester ultrasound data
- PMID: 20826073
- DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.07.014
Small and large foetuses: Identification and estimation of foetal weight at delivery from third-trimester ultrasound data
Abstract
Background: The estimation of foetal weight (EFW) at delivery is crucial to assess the risk of foetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, most notably when the foetus is small or large.
Aim: To accurately predict the EFW at delivery of small foetuses (birth weight [BW]≤2500g) and large foetuses (BW≥4000g) identified with third-trimester ultrasound data.
Methods: We included 1309 foetuses whose age and weight at birth were known and for whom standard data were available from third-trimester ultrasound scans. Small and large foetuses were identified by extrapolation to full term of the estimated foetal weight obtained using Hadlock's equation. We built two regression models for predicting the birth weights of small and large foetuses, respectively. The results obtained with these models were compared to those obtained with Hadlock's equation.
Results: Third-trimester sonograms were obtained at 33.6±1.3 weeks gestational age [WGA] and birth occurred at 38.7±1.2WGA. EFW of small foetuses predicted using the regression model showed significantly less systematic bias than the Hadlock estimate (2.3% vs. 7.2%, respectively), whereas random errors were similar. EFW of large foetuses predicted using the regression model showed significantly less random error than the Hadlock estimate (6.2% vs. 10.1%, respectively), whereas systematic bias was similar. Data from an independent validation sample indicate that our regression models are accurate.
Conclusions: To apply distinct models for accurately predicting the EFWs at delivery of small and large foetuses should prevent adverse events related to newborn size.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[Estimation of small and large fetal weight at delivery from ultrasound data].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Oct;41(6):566-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 28. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012. PMID: 22748475 French.
-
[Accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight performed by residents at delivery day].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Sep;44(7):632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Dec 4. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015. PMID: 25481768 French.
-
Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;43(1):72-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.12458. Epub 2013 Dec 8. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 23494762
-
[Ultrasound monitoring].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002 Oct;31(6 Suppl):4S18-4S20. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002. PMID: 12451354 Review. French.
-
Neuropathology and prognosis of foetal brain tumours.Acta Neuropathol. 1999 Dec;98(6):567-76. doi: 10.1007/s004010051120. Acta Neuropathol. 1999. PMID: 10603031 Review.
Cited by
-
Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasonic examination.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):540-5. eCollection 2015. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015. PMID: 25785028 Free PMC article.
-
Foetal weight prediction models at a given gestational age in the absence of ultrasound facilities: application in Indonesia.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2047-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30400880 Free PMC article.
-
Estimation of Fetal Weight during Labor: Still a Challenge.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;38(1):4-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570110. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 26814688 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical