Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Sep;160(3):435-442.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.023.

beta-Blocker use following myocardial infarction: low prevalence of evidence-based dosing

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

beta-Blocker use following myocardial infarction: low prevalence of evidence-based dosing

Jeffrey J Goldberger et al. Am Heart J. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Quality improvement programs have shown increased use of beta-blockers post-myocardial infarction (MI), but there are no data on whether appropriate doses are administered.

Methods: In a prospective registry that enrolled consecutive patients with MI, we evaluated beta-blocker dosing at discharge after MI and 3 weeks later and assessed clinical predictors for treatment with very low doses. We studied 1,971 patients (70.8% male) with a mean age of 63.9 +/- 13.7 years, of whom 48.2% had an ST-elevation MI.

Results: beta-Blocker utilization rates following MI were 93.2% at discharge: 20.1% received <25% of target dose, 36.5% received 25% of target dose, 26.4% received 26% to 50% of target dose, and 17.0% received >50% of target dose. Between discharge and 3 weeks, 76.4% had no change in beta-blocker dose, with 11.9% and 11.6% having their dose reduced and increased, respectively. Absence of hypertension, acute percutaneous coronary intervention, older age, and no angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy were consistent predictors of treatment with very low beta-blocker doses.

Conclusions: Underdosing of beta-blockers is highly prevalent among patients post-MI. This represents an important opportunity in quality improvement for the care of patients who have suffered an MI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The graph shows the percent of patients taking various doses of beta-blockers at discharge. Doses are shown as the proportion or percent of daily target dose - <25% - n=347; 25% - n=629; 26–50% - n=454; >50% - n=293. Each bar is subdivided to indicate metoprolol dosing and dosing of other beta-blockers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The graph shows the distribution of beta-blocker dosing (shown as percent of daily target dose – see legend) at 3 weeks stratified by whether the dose was reduced (n=171), remained the same (n=1095), or increased (n=167) since hospital discharge.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. A randomized trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. I. Mortality results. JAMA. 1982;247(12):1707–14. - PubMed
    1. CAPRICORN Investigators. Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;357(9266):1385–1390. - PubMed
    1. Hjalmarson A, Herlitz J, Malek I, et al. Effect on mortality of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction: A double-blind randomized trial. Lancet. 1981;2(8251):823–827. - PubMed
    1. Pedersen T. Six-year follow-up of the Norwegian Multicenter Study on Timolol after Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1055–1058. - PubMed
    1. Teo K, Yusuf S, Furberg C. Effects of prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy in acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1993;270(13):1589–1595. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances