Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 31;3(3):211-22.

MicroRNA-21 is involved in ionizing radiation-promoted liver carcinogenesis

MicroRNA-21 is involved in ionizing radiation-promoted liver carcinogenesis

Yun Zhu et al. Int J Clin Exp Med. .

Abstract

It has been known for decades that ionizing radiation (IR) promotes carcinogenesis and high-linear energy transfer (LET) IR has a higher risk than low-LET IR for carcinogenesis; however, the mechanism remains unclear. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have a critical effect on carcinogenesis through post-transcriptional modification. In this study, our purpose is to explore whether miRNAs are involved in IR-(especially high-LET IR) promoted liver carcinogenesis. We showed here that among several hundred miRNAs, miR-21 was the only one that increased 6 folds in high-LET IR-promoted mouse liver tumors when compared with that in the non-irradiated liver tissues. We also showed that miR-21 was up-regulated in human or mouse hepatocytes after exposure to IR, as well as in liver tissues derived from whole body irradiated mice. The increased level of miR-21 was more significant in high-LET irradiated cells or liver tissues. After the non-irradiated, low-LET or high-LET irradiated human hepatocytes were over-expressed with miR-21, these cells became tumorigenesis in nude mice. The tumors derived from high-LET-irradiated-cells were largest, and accompanied by more significant changes in the miR-21-targets: PTEN and RECK. In addition, we showed that IR-induced up-regulation of miR-21 depended on the up-regulation/activation of AP-1 (at an earlier time, within 2 h) and the ErbB/Stat3 pathway (at a later time, more than 2 h), which was also IR dose dependent. Taken together, we conclude that IR-induced up-regulation of miR-21 plays an important role in IR (especially high-LET IR)-promoted liver carcinogenesis.

Keywords: carcinogenesis; ionizing radiation; miR-21; microRNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Over-expression of miR-21 in liver carcinoma from irradiated mice. (A) Histology of liver tissues or tumors (H&E, × 200) from non-irradiated or high-LET irradiated (1 Gy) mice. (B) The miR-21 expression level was derived from the microarray data (LC, Sciences, LLC). The mice were irradiated with 1 Gy high-LET IR (iron) and the mice were sacrificed two years after IR. The tumor data were mean + SE obtained from three mice. (C) Histology of liver tissues or tumors (H&E, × 200) from non-irradiated or high-LET irradiated (1 Gy) mice. (D) The miR-21 expression level was analyzed by qRT-PCR. The mice were irradiated with 0.5 Gy high-LET IR (neutron) and the mice were sacrificed two years after IR. The tumor data were mean +SE obtained from ten mice.
Figure 2
Figure 2
IR-stimulated miR-21 expression in human or mouse hepatocytes and liver tissue. (A) miR-21 expression in mouse or human hepatocytes survived 0.5 Gy low-LET or high-LET IR after more than 10 generations. The miR-21 level was derived from the microarray data (LC, Sciences, LLC). The analysis is based on the non-irradiated controls (as 1). (B) miR-21 expression in liver tissue from mice (6-8 month old) at 1 day or 20 days after low or high-LET IR (0.5 Gy). The miR-21 level was derived from the microarray data (LC, Sciences, LLC). Each group had 3 mice, the analysis is based on the non-irradiated controls (as 1) *, p < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IR-stimulated miR-21 expression correlates with up-regulation/activation of AP-1 and ErbB/Stat3. (A) The levels of AP-1 (c-Fos and c-Jun) or miR-21 in LO2 (human hepatocytes) cells at different times after 1 Gy exposure. Actin was used as an internal loading control. L: the cells (LO2) that survived 0.5 Gy low-LET IR. H: the cells (LO2) that survived 0.5 Gy high-LET IR. Top panel: the image from Western blot. Bottom panel: analysis of the protein levels shown in the top panel by ImageQuant. The miR-21 level was measured by qRT-PCR. (B) The levels of Stat3, phosphorylated Stat3, and miR-21 in LO2 cells at different times after 1 Gy exposure. (C) The levels of ErbB (EGFR and ErbB2), phosphorylated ErbB and miR-21 in LO2 cells at different times after 1Gy exposure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
IR-stimulated miR-21 expression is via AP -1 at an earlier time and ErbB/Stat3 at a later time. (A) The effects of AP-1 siRNAs on the expression of miR-21 targets. LO2 cells were treated with c-Jun siRNA, c-Fos siRNA or both for 24 h and were then irradiated with 1 Gy. The cells were collected at 1 h after IR and the protein levels were measured by Western blot. Actin was used as an internal loading control. (B) The effects of AP-1 siRNA on the expression of miR-21. The cells were collected at 1 h after IR, RNA was prepared and the miR-21 levels were detected by qRT-PCR. The results were obtained from two separate experiments with 6 samples of each treatment, **, p< 0.01. (C) The effects of EGFR siRNA and ErbB2 siRNA on Stat3 activation and the expression of miR-21 targets. LO2 cells were treated with EGFR siRNA, ErbB2 siRNA, or both for 24 h and were irradiated with 1 Gy. The cells were then collected at 72 h after IR and the protein levels were measured by Western blot. (D) The effects of EGFR siRNA and ErbB2 siRNA on the miR-21 expression. The cells were treated and collected as described above, RNA was prepared and the miR-21 levels were detected by qRT-PCR. The results were obtained from two separate experiments using a total of 6 samples for each treatment, **, p< 0.01.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Up-regulation of miR-21 contributes to IR-promoted hepatocyte tumorigenesis. (A) The levels of miR-21 in NR (non-irradiated LO2 cells), L05 or H05 cells that were transfected with miR-21 or a control vector. (B) Imaging of the sizes of tumors that developed in the nude mice from the cells over-expressed with miR-21: NR-miR-21, the non-irradiated LO2 cells that were over-expressed with miR-21; L05-miR-21, the LO2 cells that survived 0.5 Gy low-LET IR and over-expressed with miR-21; H05-miR-21, the LO2 cells that survived 0.5 Gy high-LET IR and over-expressed with miR-21. Each mouse was injected subcutaneously with the same type cells at two sides of the body. Each group contained 6 mice and 12 injections. (C) Analysis of the tumor weight in the mice from different types of cell lines: NR-miR -21, L05-miR-21 or H05-miR-21: *, P< 0.05; **, P<0.01. (D) Histopathological image of tumors derived from NR-miR-21, L05-miR-21 or H05-miR-21 cells. The tumor tissues were prepared for histopathological slides with hematoxylin and easin (H&E, × 100) staining. The black arrows indicated the small blood vessels. (E) Compare the levels of miR21 targets (RECT and PTEN) in NR-miR-21, L05-miR-21 or H05-miR-21 cells versus that in NR-v, L05-v and H05-v cells. Western blot was performed and Actin was used as an internal loading control.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The effects of IR with different doses on AP-1, ErbB/Stat3 and miR-21 expression/activation. (A) The levels of AP-1 (c-Fos and c-Jun) or miR-21 in LO2 cells at 1 h after different doses of IR exposure. L and H are the same as described in Figure 3. Top panel: the image from Western blot. Bottom panel: analysis of the protein levels shown in the top panel by ImageQuant. The miR-21 level was measured by qRT-PCR. (B) The levels of EGFR, phosphorylated ErbB or Stat3 and miR-21 in LO2 cells at 72 h after different doses of IR exposure. L and H are the same as described above. Top panel: the image from Western blot. Bottom panel: analysis of the protein levels shown in the top panel by ImageQuant. The miR-21 level was measured by qRT-PCR. (C) A summary of the effects of IR-promoted liver carcinogenesis is as follows: IR stimulates miR-21 expression through the up-regulation or activation of AP-1 (at an earlier time) and ErbB/Stat3 (at a later time) pathways. AP-1 could also directly or indirectly activate the ErbB/Stat3 pathways. The over-expression of miR-21 promotes liver tumorigenesis and other IR-stimulated factors that may also facilitate the function of miR-21 and contribute to liver tumorigenesis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Redpath J, Antoniono R. Induction of an Adaptive Response against Spontaneous Neoplastic Transformation In Vitro by Low-Dose Gamma Radiation. Radiat Res. 1998;149:517–520. - PubMed
    1. Mitchel R, Jackson J, Carlisle S. Upper Dose Thresholds for Radiation-Induced Adaptive Response against Cancer in High-Dose-Exposed, Cancer-Prone, Radiation-Sensitive Trp53 Heterozygous Mice. Radiat Res. 2004;162:20–30. - PubMed
    1. Yu X, Lu L, Wen S, Wang Y. The effects of Fhit on tumorigenesis after multi-exposure to low dose radiation. IJCEM. 2009;2:348–353. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Little JB. Radiation carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:397–404. - PubMed
    1. Wakeford R. The cancer epidemiology of radiation. Oncogene. 2004;23:6404–6428. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources