Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: an in vitro study
- PMID: 20831131
- DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.34.4.p5h1068v41ggt450
Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: an in vitro study
Abstract
The present study evaluated and compared the retentive strength of three luting cements. A total of forty five freshly extracted human primary molars were used in this study. The teeth were prepared to receive stainless steel crowns. They were then randomly divided into three groups, of fifteen teeth each, so as to receive the three different luting cements: conventional glass ionomer resin modified glass ionomer and adhesive resin. The teeth were then stored in artificial saliva for twenty four hours. The retentive strength of the crowns was determined by using a specially designed Instron Universal Testing Machine (Model 1011). The data was statistically analyzed using ANOVA to evaluate retentive strength for each cement and Tukey test for pair wise comparison. It was concluded that retentive strength of adhesive resin cement and resin modified glass ionomer cement was significantly higher than that of the conventional glass ionomer cement.
Similar articles
-
In vitro Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Two New Self-adhesive Resin Cements.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):197-200. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1363. Epub 2016 Sep 27. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016. PMID: 27843249 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jan-Mar;30(1):19-26. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.95570. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012. PMID: 22565513
-
Comparison of retention and demineralization inhibition potential of adhesive banding cements in primary teeth.J Dent Child (Chic). 2010 May-Aug;77(2):66-71. J Dent Child (Chic). 2010. PMID: 20819400 Clinical Trial.
-
An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;23(1):20-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.99032. Indian J Dent Res. 2012. PMID: 22842244 Clinical Trial.
-
Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review.J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):2-7. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_313_19. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2020. PMID: 32174622
Cited by
-
In vitro Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crowns cemented with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Two New Self-adhesive Resin Cements.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):197-200. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1363. Epub 2016 Sep 27. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016. PMID: 27843249 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Retention of Pediatric BioFlx Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crowns Using Different Types of Luting Cements: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;18(6):1287. doi: 10.3390/ma18061287. Materials (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40141570 Free PMC article.
-
Utilizing an Oxidized Biopolymer to Enhance the Bonding of Glass Ionomer Luting Cement Particles for Improved Physical and Mechanical Properties.Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Aug 5;8(4):347. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8040347. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37622952 Free PMC article.
-
Retention of Bioflx, Zirconia, and Stainless Steel crowns using two different luting cements in primary molars: an in vitro study.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 15;25(1):1328. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06671-2. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40817232 Free PMC article.
-
Shear bond strength of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces.J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Oct;10(5):340-346. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.340. Epub 2018 Oct 22. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018. PMID: 30370024 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources