Comparative effectiveness research and personalized medicine: catalyzing or colliding?
- PMID: 20831298
- DOI: 10.2165/11535830-000000000-00000
Comparative effectiveness research and personalized medicine: catalyzing or colliding?
Abstract
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is generating intense attention as interest grows in finding new and better drug technology assessment processes. The federal government is supporting the expansion of CER through funding made available in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) and by establishing the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. At the same time, personalized medicine is generating debate about its place in clinical medicine, and so, naturally, how CER can or cannot play a role in personalized medicine is part of these debates. At the heart of the debate around the role of CER in personalized medicine is the nature of personalized medicine and how it fits within contemporary clinical research concepts. We maintain in this article that CER can serve to catalyze personalized medicine, but we recognize that, for this to happen, researchers will need to embrace new data sources and new analytic approaches. We also recognize that drug technology assessment processes will have to undergo necessary adaptations to accommodate CER as configured for personalized medicine, and that clinicians will need to be educated appropriately and provided access to decision-support systems through health information technology to use the information coming from this research. To illustrate our argument, we describe two ongoing CER studies funded and managed in the private sector evaluating personalized medicine interventions that have important clinical and financial implications. One of the studies investigates the clinical and financial effects of pharmacogenomic testing for warfarin as prescribed in conditions of typical practice settings. The other study is also set in community practice settings and compares cardiovascular outcomes of patients receiving clopidogrel who are extensive metabolizer phenotypes for the cytochrome P450 2C19 hepatic isoenzyme with all patients receiving prasugrel.
Similar articles
-
The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.Pain Physician. 2011 May-Jun;14(3):E249-82. Pain Physician. 2011. PMID: 21587337 Review.
-
Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.Pain Physician. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):E23-54. Pain Physician. 2010. PMID: 20119474 Review.
-
International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):813-30. doi: 10.2165/11536150-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010. PMID: 20831289 Review.
-
The implications of comparative effectiveness research for academic medicine.Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):684-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e941. Acad Med. 2011. PMID: 21512362
-
Comparative effectiveness research in cancer genomics and precision medicine: current landscape and future prospects.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jul 3;105(13):929-36. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt108. Epub 2013 May 9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013. PMID: 23661804 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparative Effectiveness Research in Pediatric Respiratory Disease: Promise and Pitfalls.Paediatr Drugs. 2018 Feb;20(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0256-y. Paediatr Drugs. 2018. PMID: 28776129 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Personalized Medicine's Bottleneck: Diagnostic Test Evidence and Reimbursement.J Pers Med. 2014 Apr 4;4(2):163-75. doi: 10.3390/jpm4020163. J Pers Med. 2014. PMID: 25563222 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on comparative effectiveness research: views from diverse constituencies.Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):789-98. doi: 10.2165/11535790-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010. PMID: 20831287 No abstract available.
-
Innovative payer engagement strategies: will the convergence lead to better value creation in personalized medicine?EPMA J. 2017 Feb 13;8(1):5-15. doi: 10.1007/s13167-017-0078-6. eCollection 2017 Dec. EPMA J. 2017. PMID: 28228864 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (sixth and seventh editions) for clinically localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and comparison with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk-stratification method.Cancer. 2012 Nov 15;118(22):5535-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27597. Epub 2012 Apr 27. Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22544661 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources