Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;24(10):795-824.
doi: 10.3109/02699206.2010.503006.

Extensions to the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS)

Affiliations

Extensions to the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS)

Lawrence D Shriberg et al. Clin Linguist Phon. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

This report describes three extensions to a classification system for paediatric speech sound disorders termed the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS). Part I describes a classification extension to the SDCS to differentiate motor speech disorders from speech delay and to differentiate among three sub-types of motor speech disorders. Part II describes the Madison Speech Assessment Protocol (MSAP), an ∼ 2-hour battery of 25 measures that includes 15 speech tests and tasks. Part III describes the Competence, Precision, and Stability Analytics (CPSA) framework, a current set of ∼ 90 perceptual- and acoustic-based indices of speech, prosody, and voice used to quantify and classify sub-types of Speech Sound Disorders (SSD). A companion paper provides reliability estimates for the perceptual and acoustic data reduction methods used in the SDCS. The agreement estimates in the companion paper support the reliability of SDCS methods and illustrate the complementary roles of perceptual and acoustic methods in diagnostic analyses of SSD of unknown origin. Examples of research using the extensions to the SDCS described in the present report include diagnostic findings for a sample of youth with motor speech disorders associated with galactosemia, and a test of the hypothesis of apraxia of speech in a group of children with autism spectrum disorders. All SDCS methods and reference databases running in the PEPPER (Programs to Examine Phonetic and Phonologic Evaluation Records) environment will be disseminated without cost when complete.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A framework for causality research in childhood speech sound disorders.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Madison Speech Assessment Protocol (MSAP) speech sampling context hierarchy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sample display of the three windows viewable during acoustic analysis: the phonetic transcript window, the waveform window, and the acoustic analysis window. For acoustic analysis, the transcript window provides information on the coded utterances (displayed to the right of the numeric utterance), any Prosody-Voice Screening Profile (PVSP) codes used, the phoneme perceptually transcribed, and the phonemes marked for acoustic analysis (highlighted using a color code). The example displayed is the first coded utterance in a conversational sample. Data for the segmented utterance and all segmented phonemes can be viewed in the acoustic analysis window using a scrolling function to include views of onset and offset times for the utterance and each individual phoneme, pauses, characteristic F0, Mean F0, minimum and maximum F0, characteristic amplitude, and F1–F3. The moment data for a segmented fricative is displayed in the upper right corner of the acoustic analysis window. The electronic version of the figure allows enlarged views of these sample screens.

References

    1. Bishop DVM. Motor immaturity and specific speech and language impairment: Evidence for a common genetic basis. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2002;114:56–63. - PubMed
    1. Bradford A, Murdoch B, Thompson E, Stokes P. Lip and tongue function in children with developmental speech disorders: A preliminary investigation. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 1997;11:363–387.
    1. Broomfield J, Dodd B. The nature of referred subtypes of primary speech disability. Child Language Teaching and Therapy. 2004;20:135–151.
    1. Campbell TF, Dollaghan CA, Rockette HE, Paradise JL, Feldman HM, Shriberg LD, et al. Risk factors for speech delay of unknown origin in 3-year-old children. Child Development. 2003;74:346–357. - PubMed
    1. Cheng HC, Chen HY, Tsai CL, Chen YJ, Cherng RJ. Comorbidity of motor and language impairments in preschool children of Taiwan. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2009;30:1054–1061. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms