Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Aug;35(4):395-400.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01106.x.

Chronic dialysis-associated anaemia in end-stage renal disease: analysis of management in two French centres

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Chronic dialysis-associated anaemia in end-stage renal disease: analysis of management in two French centres

M Perrinet et al. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Treatment of anaemia in renal-insufficient patients relies on the use of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). This study aimed to compare the impact of two different strategies of ESA prescribing on variation in haemoglobin (Hb) concentration in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients.

Methods: Patients with ESRD, on haemodialysis, and who had received ESA for >3 months were recruited. Different parameters were analysed: demographics, Hb level the last day of the year before dialysis, the most recent weekly ESA dose, risk factors for resistance and cost. Each institution continued its local practice for achieving the desired Hb level: increasing the ESA dose to overcome resistance in one centre and defining an upper ESA-dose limit in the other.

Results: A total of 185 patients were recruited. No significant differences in the biological parameters were found between the two populations. In both centres, Hb levels were comparable and mean levels exceeded 11 g/dL, despite the higher ESA doses given in one centre to achieve this target. This finding also held true for the subgroups with greater than or equal to two resistance factors. These two strategies led to large between-centre differences in treatment costs.

Conclusion: The ESA-use strategy difference probably indicates that erythropoietin-resistance was not overcome with increased dosing. The Hb concentrations remained stable even when ESA doses were increased. On current evidence, the cheaper ESA-dose limitation strategy is preferable but randomized controlled studies, including comparisons of alternative ESA formulations are necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources