Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;123(2-3):199-207.
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.012. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

The case for including Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms Syndrome in DSM-5 as a psychosis risk syndrome

Affiliations

The case for including Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms Syndrome in DSM-5 as a psychosis risk syndrome

Scott W Woods et al. Schizophr Res. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

The American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-5 has recently proposed consideration of Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms Syndrome as a new diagnosis, based on nearly 15 years of prospective research in centers across the globe. The condition is also known as "psychosis risk syndrome," "at-risk mental state," "ultra-high risk," and "putative prodrome." We review evidence favoring its inclusion as a new diagnosis in DSM-5 and report new preliminary findings on DSM-IV diagnoses in current clinical use for these patients and on results of diagnostic interviews in unselected volunteers. The main evidence supporting inclusion is: (1) the patients are currently ill, (2) the patients are at high risk for getting worse, (3) no DSM-IV diagnosis accurately captures their current illness or future risk, (4) the diagnosis has been made with reliability and validity in the research setting, and (5) placement in DSM-5 would help promote the needed treatment and prevention research to enable articulation of a standard of care to benefit these patients and their families. Potential harms can be minimized by patient, family, and provider education. It will be important to demonstrate through well-designed field trials whether the diagnostic criteria can be used with reliability in everyday clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

Drs. Woods and McGlashan are advisors to the Psychosis Work Group of the American Psychiatric Association DSM-5 Task Force. All authors declare that they have no other conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Highest SIPS positive symptom score among 30 community volunteers. On the positive symptom scales, the normal range is 0–2, the APS syndrome range 3–5, and frank psychosis 6.
Panel
Panel
Revised proposed DSM-5 criteria for APS syndrome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addington D, Bouchard RH, Goldberg J, Honer B, Malla A, Norman R, Tempier R, Berzins S. Clinical practice guidelines — treatment of schizophrenia — special issues. Can J Psychiatry. 2005a;50 (suppl 1):43S.
    1. Addington J, Amminger GP, Barbato A, Catts S, Chen E, Chhim S, Chong SA, Cullberg J, Edwards J, Grosso L, Louza M, Hambrecht M, Keshavan M, Johannessen JO, Johnson DL, Lewis S, Lieberman J, MacEwan W, Malla A, May R, McGlashan TH, McGorry P, Merlo MG, Nordentoft M, Nightingale S, Perkins D, Thara R, Yamamoto K, Yung A. International clinical practice guidelines for early psychosis. Brit J Psychiatry. 2005b;187 (Suppl 48):s120–s124. - PubMed
    1. Addington J, Cadenhead KS, Cannon TD, Cornblatt B, McGlashan TH, Perkins DO, Seidman LJ, Tsuang M, Walker EF, Woods SW, Heinssen R. North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study: a collaborative multisite approach to prodromal schizophrenia research. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33 (3):665–672. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addington J, Penn D, Woods SW, Addington D, Perkins DO. Social functioning in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2008;99 (1–3):119–124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addington J, Perkins DO, Woods SW. The PREDICT study. 2010. unpublished data.

Publication types

MeSH terms