Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;24(4):439-49.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.04.004.

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview

Affiliations

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview

Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar et al. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

There are several modalities available for a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program. When determining which CRC screening program to implement, the costs of such programs should be considered in comparison to the health benefits they are expected to provide. Cost-effectiveness analysis provides a tool to do this. In this paper we review the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening. Published studies universally indicate that when compared with no CRC screening, all screening modalities provide additional years of life at a cost that is deemed acceptable by most industrialized nations. Many recent studies even find CRC screening to be cost-saving. However, when the alternative CRC screening strategies are compared against each other in an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, no single optimal strategy emerges across the studies. There is consensus that the new technologies of stool DNA testing, computed tomographic colonography and capsule endoscopy are not yet cost-effective compared with the established CRC screening tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none

References

    1. Wilson JM, Jungner YG. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. 1968 Oct;65(4):281–393. - PubMed
    1. Goldie SJ. Chapter 15: Public health policy and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2003;(31):102–10. - PubMed
    1. Cantor SB. Cost-effectiveness analysis, extended dominance, and ethics: a quantitative assessment. Med Decis Making. 1994 Jul–Sep;14(3):259–65. - PubMed
    1. Mark DH. Visualizing cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA. 2002 May 8;287(18):2428–9. - PubMed
    1. Weinstein MC. How much are Americans willing to pay for a quality-adjusted life year? Med Care. 2008 Apr;46(4):343–5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms