Performance improvements of stool-based screening tests
- PMID: 20833351
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.03.009
Performance improvements of stool-based screening tests
Abstract
Stool testing is a widely accepted, non-invasive, technique for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) screening has been proven to decrease CRC-related mortality; however gFOBT is hampered by a low sensitivity. Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) have several advantages over gFOBT. First of all, FIT has a better sensitivity and higher uptake. Furthermore, the quantitative variant of the FIT allows choices on cut-off level for test-positivity according to colonoscopy resources available, personal risk profile, and/or intended detection rate in the screened population. Stool-based DNA (sDNA) tests aiming at the detection of specific DNA alterations may improve detection of CRC and adenomas compared to gFOBT screening, but large-scale population based studies are lacking. This review focuses on factors influencing test performance of those three stool based screening tests.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy.Eur J Cancer. 2013 Sep;49(14):3049-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 May 22. Eur J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23706981
-
Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.Gut. 2015 Aug;64(8):1327-37. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308074. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Gut. 2015. PMID: 26041750 Review.
-
Comparison of a brush-sampling fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin with a sensitive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in detection of colorectal neoplasia.Cancer. 2006 Nov 1;107(9):2152-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22230. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16998938
-
New stool screening tests for colorectal cancer.Digestion. 2007;76(1):26-33. doi: 10.1159/000108391. Epub 2007 Oct 19. Digestion. 2007. PMID: 17947816 Review.
-
Colon cancer screening: which non-invasive filter tests?Dig Dis. 2011;29 Suppl 1:56-9. doi: 10.1159/000331127. Epub 2011 Nov 15. Dig Dis. 2011. PMID: 22104755 Review.
Cited by
-
Colorectal cancer: from prevention to personalized medicine.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 14;20(22):6786-808. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6786. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24944469 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 1;2013(9):CD009259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009259.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24085634 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.Br J Cancer. 2012 Feb 28;106(5):805-16. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.580. Epub 2012 Feb 16. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22343624 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of an epigenetic biomarker panel with high sensitivity and specificity for colorectal cancer and adenomas.Mol Cancer. 2011 Jul 21;10:85. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-85. Mol Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21777459 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity of fecal occult blood testing in the cat.J Feline Med Surg. 2017 Jun;19(6):603-608. doi: 10.1177/1098612X16643752. Epub 2016 Apr 15. J Feline Med Surg. 2017. PMID: 27084754 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical