Importance of the nature of comparison conditions for testing theory-based interventions: comment on Michie and Prestwich (2010)
- PMID: 20836599
- DOI: 10.1037/a0019597
Importance of the nature of comparison conditions for testing theory-based interventions: comment on Michie and Prestwich (2010)
Abstract
Comments on the original article 'Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme' by Susan Michie and Andrew Prestwich (see record 2010-00152-001). In their admirable effort to develop a coding scheme for the theoretical contribution of intervention research, Michie and Prestwich rightly point out the importance of the presence of a comparison condition when examining the effect of an intervention on targeted theoretical variables and behavioral outcomes (Table 2, item 15). However, they fail to discuss the critical importance of the nature of the comparison condition. Weaker comparison conditions will yield stronger intervention effects; stronger comparison conditions will yield a stronger science of behavior change.
(c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
Comment in
-
Importance of the nature of comparison conditions for testing theory-based interventions: reply.Health Psychol. 2010 Sep;29(5):468-70. doi: 10.1037/a0020844. Health Psychol. 2010. PMID: 20836600
Comment on
-
Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme.Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016939. Health Psychol. 2010. PMID: 20063930
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources