Rates of labor induction and primary cesarean delivery do not correlate with rates of adverse neonatal outcome in level I hospitals
- PMID: 20836744
- DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2010.514629
Rates of labor induction and primary cesarean delivery do not correlate with rates of adverse neonatal outcome in level I hospitals
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether variation in rates of labor induction (IOL) and primary cesarean delivery (PCD) among level I hospitals is associated with differences in neonatal outcomes.
Methods: A birth certificate database was used to calculate crude and adjusted rates of IOL and PCD among 10 regional hospitals. Adjustment via logistic regression controlled for differences in medical and demographic factors. Linear regression assessed the relationship of crude and adjusted IOL and PCD rates to rates of three neonatal outcomes.
Results: IOL and PCD rates varied widely among hospitals (1.79- and 1.72-fold, respectively); variation increased following adjustment (1.93- and 1.86-fold, respectively). Rates of adverse neonatal outcomes varied by year and hospital, but not by IOL or PCD rates (p ≥ 0.05).
Conclusions: Crude and adjusted rates of labor induction and PCD vary among level I hospitals, but with no consistent effect on neonatal outcome.
Similar articles
-
The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan;192(1):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.034. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15672028
-
Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):284-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00120.x. Birth. 2006. PMID: 17150066
-
Timing of scheduled cesarean delivery in patients on a teaching versus private service: adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and neonatal outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;195(2):577-82; discussion 582-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.078. Epub 2006 Jun 13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16777051
-
Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):695-703. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163c435. Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18310373
-
Midwives, labour induction and the Wooden Spoon award part I.Pract Midwife. 2012 Mar;15(3):22, 24-7. Pract Midwife. 2012. PMID: 22479851 Review.
Cited by
-
A mixed methods evaluation of the maternal-newborn dashboard in Ontario: dashboard attributes, contextual factors, and facilitators and barriers to use: a study protocol.Implement Sci. 2016 May 4;11:59. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0427-1. Implement Sci. 2016. PMID: 27142655 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in hospital rates of induction of labour: a population-based record linkage study.BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 2;5(9):e008755. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008755. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26338687 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical