MR-compatible pumps versus manual titration of propofol for pediatric sedation
- PMID: 20836746
- DOI: 10.3109/03091902.2010.515286
MR-compatible pumps versus manual titration of propofol for pediatric sedation
Abstract
This study aimed to review the use of two methods of propofol infusion: a metred burette system where propofol is diluted in Lactated Ringer using the rule of six [ 1 ] or an infusion pump: Medrad Continuum Magnetic resonance (MR) compatible Infusion System (Medrad Inc. Indianola, PA) and to determine the difference, if any, between the total amount of drug delivered, the impact on vital signs, sedation status and discharge time of the patients. With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 140 children aged 0 to 18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II requiring sedation for elective outpatient brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination were included in the study. A total of 70 patients in each group were studied. The (Mean ± S.D.) total amount of propofol infused was significantly less in the infusion pump group (12.47 ± 7.67 mg/kg) than the metred burette system (15.84 ± 16.13 mg/kg, p = 0.003). There were also significant mean differences in awakening times (26.63 ± 16.35 vs. 37.06 ± 20.98 min, p = 0.006), and discharge times (53.46 ± 21.12 vs. 67.89 ± 26.84 min, p = 0.008) in the infusion pump group versus the buretrol infusion group. This study demonstrates that both infusion techniques preserve haemodynamic stability and are associated with minimal complications. The use of an infusion pump, which consistently maintains accurate dosing, reduces the amount of propofol judged adequate by the anaesthesiologist to achieve sedation in MRI. This leads to a more consistently faster emergence and early discharge after sedation in children undergoing MRI studies.
Similar articles
-
Randomized controlled trial for intermittent versus continuous propofol sedation for pediatric brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging studies.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;12(6):e262-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820ab881. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011. PMID: 21263367 Clinical Trial.
-
Open-label, prospective, randomized comparison of propofol and sevoflurane for laryngeal mask anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.Clin Ther. 2008 Jan;30(1):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.008. Clin Ther. 2008. PMID: 18343254 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of propofol with pentobarbital/midazolam/fentanyl sedation for magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in children.Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):e629-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3108. Epub 2007 Aug 14. Pediatrics. 2007. PMID: 17698968 Clinical Trial.
-
Bispectral index as a guide for titration of propofol during procedural sedation among children.Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1666-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1979. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15930231 Review.
-
Smart syringe pumps for drug infusion during dental intravenous sedation.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep;16(3):165-173. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.3.165. Epub 2016 Sep 30. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016. PMID: 28884149 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Drug selection for sedation and general anesthesia in children undergoing ambulatory magnetic resonance imaging.Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020 Jul;37(3):159-168. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2020.00171. Epub 2020 Apr 17. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020. PMID: 32299181 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical