Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;56(4):741-9.
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.157297.

Robust early pregnancy prediction of later preeclampsia using metabolomic biomarkers

Affiliations

Robust early pregnancy prediction of later preeclampsia using metabolomic biomarkers

Louise C Kenny et al. Hypertension. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific syndrome that causes substantial maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The etiology is incompletely understood, and there is no clinically useful screening test. Current metabolomic technologies have allowed the establishment of metabolic signatures of preeclampsia in early pregnancy. Here, a 2-phase discovery/validation metabolic profiling study was performed. In the discovery phase, a nested case-control study was designed, using samples obtained at 15±1 weeks' gestation from 60 women who subsequently developed preeclampsia and 60 controls taking part in the prospective Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints cohort study. Controls were proportionally population matched for age, ethnicity, and body mass index at booking. Plasma samples were analyzed using ultra performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A multivariate predictive model combining 14 metabolites gave an odds ratio for developing preeclampsia of 36 (95% CI: 12 to 108), with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.94. These findings were then validated using an independent case-control study on plasma obtained at 15±1 weeks from 39 women who subsequently developed preeclampsia and 40 similarly matched controls from a participating center in a different country. The same 14 metabolites produced an odds ratio of 23 (95% CI: 7 to 73) with an area under receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.92. The finding of a consistent discriminatory metabolite signature in early pregnancy plasma preceding the onset of preeclampsia offers insight into disease pathogenesis and offers the tantalizing promise of a robust presymptomatic screening test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The scores plot for a PLD-DA model using the optimal number of latent vectors (n=1) for data taken from the “discovery” nested case-control study (yellow indicates preeclampsia; blue, controls). Model construction was performed using 5-fold cross-validation resulting in an R2 of 0.76 and Q2 of 0.68. The R2 distribution plot shows that the chosen model’s R2 value is significantly distant from the H0 randomly classified permutation distribution (n=1000); thus, the probability of the presented model randomly occurring is <0.001. Partial least-squares (PLS) score can be considered as the weighted linear combination of the “information-rich” peaks, which best discriminate between the preeclampsia and control samples. AUC curve was 0.99.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The PLS-DA model predictions for the final 14-metabolite signature found by the genetic algorithm search program (C indicates controls, blue circles; PE, preeclampsia, yellow squares).
a, Model predictions for the discovery phase data; R2=0.54, Q2=0.52, an AUC of 0.94, an optimal odds ratio of 36 (95% CI: 12 to 108), and Hotelling T2 P=2×10−6. b, Model predictions for the validation data; R2=0.43, Q2=0.39, an AUC of 0.92, an optimal odds ratio of 23 (95% CI: 7 to 73), and Hotelling T2 P=2×10−3.

References

    1. Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2005;365:785–799. - PubMed
    1. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;335:974. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, Lim KH, England LJ, Yu KF, Schisterman EF, Thadhani R, Sachs BP, Epstein FH, Sibai BM, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:672–683. - PubMed
    1. Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science. 2005;308:1592–1594. - PubMed
    1. Meads CA, Cnossen JS, Meher S, Juarez-Garcia A, ter Riet G, Duley L, Roberts TE, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Leeflang MM, Barton PM, et al. Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: Systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12(iii–iv):1–270. - PubMed

Publication types