Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Aug;107(34-35):596-601.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0596. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

Fecal incontinence: part 4 of a series of articles on incontinence

Affiliations
Review

Fecal incontinence: part 4 of a series of articles on incontinence

Michael Probst et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The aging of the population will make fecal incontinence an increasingly important socioeconomic problem in the coming decades. Already today, the cost to society of treating incontinence with inserts, diapers, and closed systems exceeds the total cost of all cardiac and anti-inflammatory medications.

Methods: This article is based on a selective review of the literature and on clinical experience. No meta-analyses on this topic have yet been published.

Results: Surveys in highly industrialized countries in the Western Hemisphere have shown that about 5% of the population suffers from fecal incontinence of varying degrees of severity. This condition will become more common, in both relative and absolute terms, in the coming decades. Various methods of care and therapy are currently available for fecal incontinence, yet many patients do not seek medical help for it because of embarrassment. Thus, its true prevalence is certainly higher than the surveys imply.

Conclusion: The challenge today, therefore, is not just to encourage patients to seek medical help early, but also to raise physicians' awareness of fecal incontinence and their readiness to treat it, so that they can provide competent individual counseling and treatment to all patients who suffer from it.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Anatomy: cross-section of the continence organ; with the kind permission of Dr. Kade Pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH, Berlin
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rectal prolapse; triggered on the lavatory
Figure 3
Figure 3
MRI scan of the sphincter area with contrast substance

References

    1. Wagner TH, Hu TW. Economic costs of urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9:127–128. - PubMed
    1. Enck P, et al. Epidemiologie der Stuhlinkontinenz. Kontinenz. 1994;2:59–66.
    1. Rockwood TH. Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:106–113. - PubMed
    1. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–97. - PubMed
    1. De Lillo AR, Rose S. Functional bowel disorders in the geriatric patient: constipation, fecal impaction and fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:901–905. - PubMed

MeSH terms