Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Oct;33(8):828-33.
doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181eec14c.

Phase 2 trial of single agent Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase 2 trial of single agent Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Richard E Royal et al. J Immunother. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

New, effective therapies are needed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ipilimumab can mediate an immunologic tumor regression in other histologies. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of Ipilimumab for advanced pancreatic cancer. Subjects were adults with locally advanced or metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma with measurable disease, good performance status, and minimal comorbidities. Ipilimumab was administered intravenously (3.0 mg/kg every 3 wk; 4 doses/course) for a maximum of 2 courses. Response rate by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria and toxicity were measured. Twenty-seven subjects were enrolled (metastatic disease: 20 and locally advanced: 7) with median age of 55 years (27 to 68 y) and good performance status (26 with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status =0 to 1). Three subjects experienced ≥ grade 3 immune-mediated adverse events (colitis:1, encephalitis:1, hypohysitis:1). There were no responders by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria but a subject experienced a delayed response after initial progressive disease. In this subject, new metastases after 2 doses of Ipilimumab established progressive disease. But continued administration of the agent per protocol resulted in significant delayed regression of the primary lesion and 20 hepatic metastases. This was reflected in tumor markers normalization, and clinically significant improvement of performance status. Single agent Ipilimumab at 3.0 mg/kg/dose is ineffective for the treatment of advanced pancreas cancer. However, a significant delayed response in one subject of this trial suggests that immunotherapeutic approaches to pancreas cancer deserve further exploration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All other authors have declared there are no financial conflicts of interest in regard to this work.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Maximal response in sum of maximal diameters of index lesions for subjects in this study. The single patient with a decrease exceeding 30% was not a responder by RECIST criteria due to new lesions at evaluation. These lesions subsequently regressed. Two patients with locally advanced disease showed a minor response.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Overall survival of patients on trial. One patient is lost to follow-up after progression of disease at 12 weeks. Many patients entered with metastatic disease receiving Ipilimumab as second line therapy. Short survival is characteristic for these patients.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
A patient with pancreas adenocarcinoma was treated with Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks with immune-mediated tumor regression evident after the mid-course 1 evaluation. A–C, The primary tumor (white arrows with the letter “P”) and liver metastases (white arrows) regress after mid-course 1 evaluation in representative tumors. Four new metastases developed between start of treatment and the midcourse evaluation. A new metastasis is shown by the right hepatic vein at midcourse evaluation in (B). D, Tumor markers during the 2 courses of treatment show a decline in all measures after mid course-1 evaluation. E, Change in tumor size relative to size at the presentation of the lesion. Four new hepatic metastases are depicted at mid course-1 evaluation with baseline tumor size measured at 100% at this time point

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Royal RE, Wolff RA, Crane CH. Pancreatic cancer In: DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 8th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:1098–1136.
    1. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY, et al. National failure to operate on early stage pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;246: 173–180. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakkevold KE, Arnesjo B, Dahl O, et al. Adjuvant combination chemotherapy (AMF) following radical resection of carcinoma of the pancreas and papilla of Vater–results of a controlled, prospective, randomised multicentre study. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A:698–703. - PubMed
    1. Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg. 1985;120:899–903. - PubMed
    1. Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J, Sahmoud T, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Surg. 1999;230:776–782. discussion 782–784. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms