A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer MET inhibitor foretinib free base tablet formulation to bisphosphate salt capsule formulation in patients with solid tumors
- PMID: 20842406
- DOI: 10.1007/s10637-010-9536-x
A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer MET inhibitor foretinib free base tablet formulation to bisphosphate salt capsule formulation in patients with solid tumors
Abstract
Purpose: This phase I, open-label, randomized, 2-part crossover study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of single doses of the anticancer MET inhibitor foretinib (formerly known as GSK1363089, EXEL-2880 and XL-880) free base tablet formulation compared to a bisphosphate salt capsule formulation (Part 1), and assessed the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the bisphosphate salt capsule administered 3 times a week in cancer patients (Part 2).
Patients and methods: In Part 1, patients were randomized in a crossover manner to receive a single oral dose of foretinib formulated as a bisphosphate salt capsule (240 mg; 183 mg free base equivalent) followed one week later by a single dose of a free base tablet (180 mg), or vice versa where the treatment sequence was reversed. In Part 2, patients self-administered oral doses of bisphosphate salt capsules (200 mg) 3 times a week until disease progression.
Results: Twelve patients with solid tumors were enrolled and completed Part 1, and 10 patients continued into Part 2. Most AEs were mild or moderate in severity. The most common drug-related AEs were fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. The least-squares (LS) mean total area under the curve was 3144 and 3514 ng*h/mL for the free base tablet and bisphosphate salt capsule, respectively, with a ratio of 0.89 (90% confidence interval, CI: 0.69, 1.16). The LS mean maximal concentration (Cmax) was 81.6 and 98.5 ng/mL for the free base and bisphosphate salt, respectively, with a ratio of 0.83 (90% confidence interval, CI: 0.67, 1.02). The time to reach Cmax was ∼4 h for both formulations. The pharmacokinetics of foretinib were not clinically different between the 2 formulations. Of the 10 patients assessed for efficacy, 3 patients achieved stable disease.
Conclusions: Foretinib was well tolerated as single doses of both the free base and bisphosphate salt formulations. The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of the 2 formulations were not clinically different. The bisphosphate salt formulation was well tolerated on a 3-times a week dosing schedule, and reached steady-state plasma concentration after 2 weeks.
Similar articles
-
A Phase 1 dose-escalation study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral foretinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors.Invest New Drugs. 2013 Jun;31(3):742-50. doi: 10.1007/s10637-012-9881-z. Epub 2012 Oct 6. Invest New Drugs. 2013. PMID: 23054208 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized phase 1 crossover study assessing the bioequivalence of capsule and tablet formulations of dovitinib (TKI258) in patients with advanced solid tumors.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Nov;78(5):921-927. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3122-7. Epub 2016 Sep 28. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27681579 Clinical Trial.
-
Population pharmacokinetics modeling and analysis of foretinib in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct;55(10):1184-92. doi: 10.1002/jcph.546. Epub 2015 Jul 7. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015. PMID: 25998042 Clinical Trial.
-
The expanding family of c-Met inhibitors in solid tumors: a comparative analysis of their pharmacologic and clinical differences.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022 Apr;172:103602. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103602. Epub 2022 Jan 19. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022. PMID: 35063635 Review.
-
Pharmacokinetic considerations for new targeted therapies.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb;85(2):208-11. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.242. Epub 2008 Dec 17. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009. PMID: 19092780 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Structural and Molecular Insight into Resistance Mechanisms of First Generation cMET Inhibitors.ACS Med Chem Lett. 2019 Aug 2;10(9):1322-1327. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00276. eCollection 2019 Sep 12. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2019. PMID: 31531204 Free PMC article.
-
C-MET inhibitors in the treatment of lung cancer.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2014 Dec;15(4):670-82. doi: 10.1007/s11864-014-0313-5. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25266653 Review.
-
Foretinib (XL880): c-MET inhibitor with activity in papillary renal cell cancer.Curr Oncol Rep. 2013 Apr;15(2):83-90. doi: 10.1007/s11912-013-0299-3. Curr Oncol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23408121 Review.
-
MET inhibitors in combination with other therapies in non-small cell lung cancer.Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2012 Dec;1(4):238-53. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2012.10.08. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2012. PMID: 25806189 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ockham's razor for the MET-driven invasive growth linking idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and cancer.J Transl Med. 2016 Sep 2;14(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-1008-4. J Transl Med. 2016. PMID: 27590450 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous