Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective
- PMID: 20844608
- PMCID: PMC2939395
- DOI: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212
Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective
Abstract
Background: Research training is essential in a modern undergraduate medical curriculum. Our evaluation aimed to (a) gauge students' awareness of research activities, (b) compare students' perceptions of their transferable and research-specific skills competencies, (c) determine students' motivation for research and (d) obtain students' personal views on doing research.
Methods: Undergraduate medical students (N = 317) completed a research skills questionnaire developed by the Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning in Applied Undergraduate Research Skills (CETL-AURS) at Reading University. The questionnaire assessed students' transferable skills, research-specific skills (e.g., study design, data collection and data analysis), research experience and attitude and motivation towards doing research.
Results: The majority of students are motivated to pursue research. Graduate entrants and male students appear to be the most confident regarding their research skills competencies. Although all students recognise the role of research in medical practice, many are unaware of the medical research activities or successes within their university. Of those who report no interest in a career incorporating research, a common perception was that researchers are isolated from patients and clinical practice.
Discussion: Students have a narrow definition of research and what it entails. An explanation for why research competence does not align more closely with research motivation is derived from students' lack of understanding of the concept of translational research, as well as a lack of awareness of the research activity being undertaken by their teachers and mentors. We plan to address this with specific research awareness initiatives.
Keywords: research skills; scholarly activity programmes; training; translational research; undergraduate.
References
-
- General Medical Council UK. Tomorrows Doctors, outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education; 2009. Sep,
-
- Scottish Deans Medical Education Group. 3. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Deans Medical Education Group; 2009. The Scottish Doctor: learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. - PubMed
-
- Illing J. Thinking about research: frameworks, ethics and scholarship. Edinburgh, UK: ASME; 2007.
-
- World Federation for Medical Education. International standards in medical education: assessment and accreditation of medical schools educational programmes. A WFME position paper. Med Educ. 1998;32:549–58. - PubMed
-
- Boninger M, Troen P, Green E, Borkan J, Lance-Jones C, Humphrey A, et al. Implementation of a longitudinal mentored scholarly project: an approach at two medical schools. Acad Med. 2010;85:429–37. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources