Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec;50(12):1120, 1122-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-2053-2.

[Strategies for reducing the CT radiation dose]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Free article
Review

[Strategies for reducing the CT radiation dose]

[Article in German]
S T Schindera et al. Radiologe. 2010 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

The rapid technical advances in computed tomography have led to an increased number of clinical indications. Unfortunately, at the same time the radiation exposure to the population has also increased due to the increased total number of CT examinations. In the last few years various publications have demonstrated the feasibility of radiation dose reduction for CT examinations with no compromise in image quality and loss in interpretation accuracy. The majority of the proposed methods for dose optimization are easy to apply and are independent of the detector array configuration. This article reviews indication-dependent principles (e.g. application of reduced tube voltage for CT angiography, selection of the collimation and the pitch, reducing the total number of imaging series, lowering the tube voltage and tube current for non-contrast CT scans), manufacturer-dependent principles (e.g. accurate application of automatic modulation of tube current, use of adaptive image noise filter and use of iterative image reconstruction) and general principles (e.g. appropriate patient-centering in the gantry, avoiding over-ranging of the CT scan, lowering the tube voltage and tube current for survey CT scans) which lead to radiation dose reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Invest Radiol. 2008 Dec;43(12):871-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 1996;6(4):485-8 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):899-907 - PubMed
    1. Acad Radiol. 2009 Aug;16(8):997-1002 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2009 Aug;252(2):433-40 - PubMed

MeSH terms