Does emergency medical dispatch priority predict delphi process-derived levels of prehospital intervention?
- PMID: 20845315
- DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00008244
Does emergency medical dispatch priority predict delphi process-derived levels of prehospital intervention?
Abstract
Objective: The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) is an emergency medical dispatch system widely used to prioritize 9-1-1 calls and optimize resource allocation. This study evaluates whether the assigned priority predicts a Delphi process-derived level of prehospital intervention in each emergency medical dispatch category.
Methods: All patients given a MPDS priority in a suburban California county from 2004-2006 were included. A Delphi process of emergency medical services (EMS) professionals in another system developed the following categories of prehospital treatment representing increasing acuity, which were adapted for this study: advanced life support (ALS) intervention, ALS-Stat, and ALS-Critical. The sensitivities and specificities of MPDS priority for level of prehospital intervention were determined for each MPDS category. Likelihood ratios of low and high priority dispatch codes for the level of prehospital intervention also were calculated for each MPDS category.
Results: A total of 65,268 patients met inclusion criteria, representing 61% of EMS calls during the study period. The overall sensitivities of high-priority dispatch codes for ALS, ALS-Stat, and ALS-Critical interventions were 83% (95% confidence interval 83-84%), 83% (82-84%), and 94% (92-96%). Overall specificities were: ALS, 32% (31-32%); ALS-Stat, 31% (30-31%); and ALS-Critical 28% (28-29%). Compared to calls assigned to a low priority, calls with high-priority dispatch codes were more likely to receive ALS interventions by 22%, ALS-Stat by 20%, and ALS-Critical by 32%. A low priority dispatch code decreased the likelihood of ALS interventions by 48%, ALS-Stat by 45%, and ALS-Critical by 80%. Among high-priority dispatch codes, the rates of interventions were: ALS 26%, ALS-Stat 22%, and ALS-Critical 1.5%, all of which were significantly greater than low-priority calls (p<0.05) [ALS 13%, ALS-Stat 11%, and ALS-Critical 0.2%]. Major MPDS were categories with high sensitivities (>95%) for ALS interventions included breathing problems, cardiac or respiratory arrest/death, chest pain, stroke, and unconscious/fainting; these categories had an average specificity of 3%. Medical Priority Dispatch System categories such as back pain, unknown problem, and traumatic injury had sensitivities for ALS interventions<15%.
Conclusions: The MPDS is moderately sensitive for the Delphi process derived ALS, ALS-Stat, and ALS-Critical intervention levels, but nonspecific. A low MPDS priority is predictive of no prehospital intervention. A high priority, however, is of little predictive value for ALS, ALS-Stat, or ALS-Critical interventions.
Comment in
-
Predictive ability of emergency medical priority dispatch system protocols should be assessed at the atomic level of the determinant code.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):318-9. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00008256. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010. PMID: 20845316 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The ability of emergency medical dispatch codes of medical complaints to predict ALS prehospital interventions.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;11(2):192-8. doi: 10.1080/10903120701205984. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007. PMID: 17454806
-
Which emergency medical dispatch codes predict high prehospital nontransport rates in an urban community?Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):28-34. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.825349. Epub 2013 Sep 12. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014. PMID: 24028558
-
How well do emergency medical dispatch codes predict prehospital medication administration in a diverse urban community?J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):413-422.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.086. Epub 2012 Oct 22. J Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 23089206
-
Improving ambulance dispatch triage to trauma: A scoping review using the framework of development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules.Injury. 2022 Jun;53(6):1746-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.020. Epub 2022 Mar 11. Injury. 2022. PMID: 35321793
-
The accuracy of medical dispatch - a systematic review.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Nov 9;26(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0528-8. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 30413213 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Complementarity of Clinician Judgment and Evidence Based Models in Medical Decision Making: Antecedents, Prospects, and Challenges.Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1425693. doi: 10.1155/2016/1425693. Epub 2016 Aug 24. Biomed Res Int. 2016. PMID: 27642588 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The appropriateness of low-acuity cases referred for emergency ambulance dispatch following ambulance service secondary telephone triage: A retrospective cohort study.PLoS One. 2019 Aug 13;14(8):e0221158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221158. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31408496 Free PMC article.
-
Paramedic management of back pain: a scoping review.BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 9;22(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00699-1. BMC Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35945506 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and case characteristics associated with 'no paramedic treatment' for low-acuity cases referred for emergency ambulance dispatch following a secondary telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 10;26(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0475-4. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29321074 Free PMC article.
-
Detailed analysis of prehospital interventions in medical priority dispatch system determinants.West J Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;12(1):19-29. West J Emerg Med. 2011. PMID: 21691468 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous