Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Mar;19(3):671-4.
doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.201. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Waist circumference, BMI, and visceral adipose tissue in white women and women of African descent

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Waist circumference, BMI, and visceral adipose tissue in white women and women of African descent

Anne E Sumner et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Although waist circumference (WC) is a marker of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), WC cut-points are based on BMI category. We compared WC-BMI and WC-VAT relationships in blacks and whites. Combining data from five studies, BMI and WC were measured in 1,409 premenopausal women (148 white South Africans, 607 African-Americans, 186 black South Africans, 445 West Africans, 23 black Africans living in United States). In three of five studies, participants had VAT measured by computerized tomography (n = 456). Compared to whites, blacks had higher BMI (29.6 ± 7.6 (mean ± s.d.) vs. 27.6 ± 6.6 kg/m², P = 0.001), similar WC (92 ± 16 vs. 90 ± 15 cm, P = 0.27) and lower VAT (64 ± 42 vs. 101 ± 59 cm², P < 0.001). The WC-BMI relationship did not differ by race (blacks: β (s.e.) WC = 0.42 (.01), whites: β (s.e.) WC = 0.40 (0.01), P = 0.73). The WC-VAT relationship was different in blacks and whites (blacks: β (s.e.) WC = 1.38 (0.11), whites: β (s.e.) WC = 3.18 (0.21), P < 0.001). Whites had a greater increase in VAT per unit increase in WC. WC-BMI and WC-VAT relationships did not differ among black populations. As WC-BMI relationship did not differ by race, the same BMI-based WC guidelines may be appropriate for black and white women. However, if WC is defined by VAT, race-specific WC thresholds are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
BMI vs. waist circumference: scatter plots and linear regression line for each group. Equations for white South Africans: BMI = −7.9 + 0.39 WC; African Americans: BMI = −10.4 + 0.44 WC; black South Africans: BMI = −5.7 + 0.40 WC; West Africans: BMI = −5.0 + 0.37 WC; black Africans in United States: BMI = −6.0 + 0.38 WC. WC, waist circumference.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visceral adipose tissue vs. waist circumference: scatter plots and linear regression line for each group. Equations for white South Africans: VAT = −185 + 3.18 WC; African Americans: VAT = −111 + 1.65 WC; black South Africans: VAT = −50 + 1.38 WC; black Africans in United States: VAT = −115 + 1.88 WC. VAT, visceral adipose tissue; WC, waist circumference.

References

    1. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity Circulation. 2009;120:1640–1645. - PubMed
    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Bray GA, Greenway FL, et al. Racial differences in abdominal depot-specific adiposity in white and African American adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:7–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Micklesfield LK, Evans J, Norris SA, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometric estimates of visceral fat in Black and White South African Women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;18:619–624. - PubMed
    1. Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-Holt DD, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U.S. population: National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1263–1268. - PubMed
    1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009;119:e21–181. - PubMed

Publication types