Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Feb;19(2):338-44.
doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.208. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: a randomized behavioral weight loss trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: a randomized behavioral weight loss trial

Lora E Burke et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Technology may improve self-monitoring adherence and dietary changes in weight loss treatment. Our study aimed to investigate whether using a personal digital assistant (PDA) with dietary and exercise software, with and without a feedback message, compared to using a paper diary/record (PR), results in greater weight loss and improved self-monitoring adherence. Healthy adults (N = 210) with a mean BMI of 34.01 kg/m(2) were randomized to one of three self-monitoring approaches: PR (n = 72), PDA with self-monitoring software (n = 68), or PDA with self-monitoring software and daily feedback messages (PDA+FB, n = 70). All participants received standard behavioral treatment. Self-monitoring adherence and change in body weight, waist circumference, and diet were assessed at 6 months; retention was 91%. All participants had a significant weight loss (P < 0.01) but weight loss did not differ among groups. A higher proportion of PDA+FB participants (63%) achieved ≥ 5% weight loss in comparison to the PR group (46%) (P < 0.05) and PDA group (49%) (P = 0.09). Median percent self-monitoring adherence over the 6 months was higher in the PDA groups (PDA 80%; PDA+FB 90%) than in the PR group (55%) (P < 0.01). Waist circumference decreased more in the PDA groups than the PR group (P = 0.02). Similarly, the PDA groups reduced energy and saturated fat intake more than the PR group (P < 0.05). Self-monitoring adherence was greater in the PDA groups with the greatest weight change observed in the PDA+FB group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. CONSORT Diagram
PR, paper record; PDA, personal digital assistant; PDA+FB, personal digital assistant plus feedback.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proportion of participants adherent to self-monitoring over time (N = 210)
PR, paper record; PDA, personal digital assistant; PDA+FB, personal digital assistant with the added customized feedback program. Based on the nonlinear mixed effects modeling, adherence to self monitoring decreased over time in all treatment groups (P < 0.001). The PDA+FB group was more adherent than the PR group (P = 0.003) and the PDA group was more adherent than the PR group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the PDA and the PDA+FB groups (P = 0.11).

References

    1. Baker RC, Kirschenbaum DS. Weight control during the holidays: highly consistent self-monitoring as a potentially useful coping mechanism. Health Psychol. 1998;17:367–70. - PubMed
    1. Baker RC, Kirschenbaum DS. Self-monitoring may be necessary for successful weight control. Behav Ther. 1993;24:377–94.
    1. Guare JC, Wing RR, Marcus M, Epstein LH, Burton LR, Gooding WE. Analysis of change in eating behavior and weight loss in Type II diabetic patient: Which behaviors to change. Diabetes Care. 1989;12:500–3. - PubMed
    1. Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172–7. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services C, National Center for Health Statistics Vital and Health Statistics. (Series 10).Summary Health Statistics for U.S. Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2008. 2009 November;(Number 242) - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms