Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis
- PMID: 20848140
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis
Abstract
Background: Currently, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) provides a safe and effective alternative to open appendectomy (OA), but its use remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of LA through a metaanalysis.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LA and OA published between January 1992 and February 2010 were included in this study. Strict literature appraisal and data extraction were carried out independently by two reviewers. A metaanalysis then was performed to evaluate operative time, hospital cost, postoperative complications, length of analgesia, bowel function recovery, day liquid diet began, hospital stay, and return to work and normal activity.
Results: The metaanalysis comprised 25 RCTs involving 4,694 patients (2,220 LA and 2,474 OA cases). No significant differences were found between the LA and OA groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), or type of appendiceal inflammation. Compared with OA, LA showed advantages of fewer postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.98; p = 0.04), less pain (length of analgesia: weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.53; 95% CI, -0.91 to -0.15; p = 0.007), earlier start of liquid diet (WMD, -0.51; 95% CI, -0.75 to -0.28; p < 0.0001), shorter hospital stay (WMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.02 to -0.35; p < 0.0001), and earlier return to work (WMD, -3.09; 95% CI, -5.22 to -0.97; p = 0.004) and normal activity (WMD, -4.73; 95% CI, -6.54 to -2.92; p < 0.00001), but a comparable hospital cost (WMD of LA/OA ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.40; p = 0.47) and a longer operative time (WMD, 10.71; 95% CI, 6.76-14.66; p < 0.00001).
Conclusion: Despite the longer operative time, LA results in less postoperative pain, faster postoperative rehabilitation, a shorter hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications than OA. Therefore, LA is worth recommending as an effective and safe procedure for acute appendicitis.
Similar articles
-
A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.Can J Surg. 1999 Oct;42(5):377-83. Can J Surg. 1999. PMID: 10526524 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):574-80. doi: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404524. JSLS. 2009. PMID: 20202400 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in overweight patients.Surg Endosc. 2001 Apr;15(4):387-92. doi: 10.1007/s004640000334. Epub 2001 Feb 6. Surg Endosc. 2001. PMID: 11395821 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 21047410 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric population: a literature review and analysis of complications.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Oct;22(8):834-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0492. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012. PMID: 23039707 Review.
Cited by
-
WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 18;11:34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0090-5. eCollection 2016. World J Emerg Surg. 2016. PMID: 27437029 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9. World J Emerg Surg. 2023. PMID: 38066631 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7. Epub 2016 Sep 22. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 27660247 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5. eCollection 2016. World J Emerg Surg. 2016. PMID: 27582784 Free PMC article.
-
Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):127-38. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1573-9. Epub 2012 Aug 30. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013. PMID: 22932909
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources