Oral nutrition in labour: 'whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature
- PMID: 20850211
- DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.006
Oral nutrition in labour: 'whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature
Abstract
Objective: to identify factors affecting women's oral nutrition in labour.
Design: literature review (1988-2009).
Setting: Westernised maternity care settings.
Participants: women, midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists and hospitals.
Measurements and findings: when addressing labour stages, the risk categorisation of women and maternal/fetal birthing outcomes, there was a lack of consistent evidence identifying adverse outcomes for mothers/infants when oral nutrition in labour had occurred.
Key conclusions: little evidence exists to support the continuance of restrictive practices around oral nutrition in labour for all women. Women's choice is impacted by health practitioners' opinions, experience and practice methods and policy (or lack thereof). Policies are not reflective of current evidence.
Implications for practice: women's choices and desires regarding oral nutrition in labour need to be addressed. Clear guidelines/policies need to be established based on current evidence. Midwives need greater exposure to research, as well as involvement in policy development and implementation.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A midwifery practice dichotomy on oral intake in labour.Midwifery. 2004 Mar;20(1):72-81. doi: 10.1016/S0266-6138(03)00055-X. Midwifery. 2004. PMID: 15020029
-
A comparative study of the effect of food consumption on labour and birth outcomes in Australia.Midwifery. 2007 Jun;23(2):131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.03.007. Epub 2006 Oct 2. Midwifery. 2007. PMID: 17011681
-
A qualitative study of factors that influence midwives' practice in relation to low-risk women's oral intake in labour in Australia.Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):e455-e463. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 30. Women Birth. 2020. PMID: 31796342
-
Oral intake during labor: a review of the evidence.MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):197-203; quiz 204-5. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3181db48f5. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2010. PMID: 20585208 Review.
-
Women's experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis.Midwifery. 2009 Apr;25(2):e49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Nov 8. Midwifery. 2009. PMID: 17996342 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical