Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Oct;27(5):674-86.
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

Oral nutrition in labour: 'whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Oral nutrition in labour: 'whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature

Ruth King et al. Midwifery. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: to identify factors affecting women's oral nutrition in labour.

Design: literature review (1988-2009).

Setting: Westernised maternity care settings.

Participants: women, midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists and hospitals.

Measurements and findings: when addressing labour stages, the risk categorisation of women and maternal/fetal birthing outcomes, there was a lack of consistent evidence identifying adverse outcomes for mothers/infants when oral nutrition in labour had occurred.

Key conclusions: little evidence exists to support the continuance of restrictive practices around oral nutrition in labour for all women. Women's choice is impacted by health practitioners' opinions, experience and practice methods and policy (or lack thereof). Policies are not reflective of current evidence.

Implications for practice: women's choices and desires regarding oral nutrition in labour need to be addressed. Clear guidelines/policies need to be established based on current evidence. Midwives need greater exposure to research, as well as involvement in policy development and implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources