This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Review

. 2010 Oct;82(4):310-3.

doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Aug 30.

Parental involvement laws and parent-daughter communication: policy without proof

Robert D Webster, Amy N Neustadt, Amy K Whitaker, Melissa L Gilliam

PMID: 20851223
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.003

Review

Parental involvement laws and parent-daughter communication: policy without proof

Robert D Webster et al. Contraception. 2010 Oct.

. 2010 Oct;82(4):310-3.

doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Aug 30.

Authors

Robert D Webster, Amy N Neustadt, Amy K Whitaker, Melissa L Gilliam

PMID: 20851223
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.003

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
Blasdell J. Blasdell J. Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law. 2002;10(2):287-304. Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law. 2002. PMID: 16526133 No abstract available.
Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception.
Arons JR. Arons JR. William Mary Law Rev. 2000 Mar;41(3):1093-131. William Mary Law Rev. 2000. PMID: 16329212 No abstract available.
The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
Scuder AC. Scuder AC. Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law. 2002;10(3):711-41. Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law. 2002. PMID: 16594112 No abstract available.
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D. Haas-Wilson D. J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511. J Policy Anal Manage. 1993. PMID: 10127357 Review.
Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception.
Jones RK, Boonstra H. Jones RK, et al. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):182-91. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.182.04. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004. PMID: 15519960 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion.
Janiak E, Fulcher IR, Cottrill AA, Tantoco N, Mason AH, Fortin J, Sabino J, Goldberg AB. Janiak E, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;133(5):978-986. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003190. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30969206 Free PMC article.
Factors influencing parental involvement among minors seeking an abortion: a qualitative study.
Hasselbacher LA, Dekleva A, Tristan S, Gilliam ML. Hasselbacher LA, et al. Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):2207-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302116. Epub 2014 Sep 11. Am J Public Health. 2014. PMID: 25211726 Free PMC article.
Young Women's Experiences Obtaining Judicial Bypass for Abortion in Texas.
Coleman-Minahan K, Stevenson AJ, Obront E, Hays S. Coleman-Minahan K, et al. J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jan;64(1):20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Sep 6. J Adolesc Health. 2019. PMID: 30197199 Free PMC article.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- ClinicalKey
- Elsevier Science