Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading
- PMID: 20852237
- DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.6.740
Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading
Abstract
Three experiments explored whether patterns of eye movements during reading might help explain syntactic prominence effects that are typically observed using reaction time tasks. Participants read sentences in which target words were in syntactically prominent or syntactically less prominent positions. Across all three experiments, using three types of syntactic prominence manipulations, there were fewer fixations and shorter reading times for words in more prominent positions, indicating that enhanced accessibility of syntactically prominent words is not caused by increased processing time. Rather, syntactic prominence appears to facilitate early encoding/lexical access and sentence integration processes while also, as shown previously, increasing activation of concepts in a comprehender's sentence or discourse representation. We propose that enhanced encoding and sentence integration processes can be attributed to an increase in attentional resources for more prominent concepts, and that this increase derives from readers' immediate sensitivity to informational prominence contours that are signaled by syntax.
Similar articles
-
The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.Mem Cognit. 2009 Dec;37(8):1164-76. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1164. Mem Cognit. 2009. PMID: 19933459
-
Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 9;12(3):e0173720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173720. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28278305 Free PMC article.
-
The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1677-83. doi: 10.1037/a0019959. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010. PMID: 20731513
-
Parafoveal processing in reading.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):5-35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012. PMID: 22042596 Review.
-
Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing.Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Nov;18(11):605-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 5. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014. PMID: 25200381 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;31(1):73-79. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1036089. Epub 2015 Apr 21. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26878026 Free PMC article.
-
Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042533. Epub 2012 Aug 17. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22912708 Free PMC article.
-
What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.J Mem Lang. 2013 Oct 1;69(3):196-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.003. J Mem Lang. 2013. PMID: 24014934 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Sep;42(9):1400-16. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000256. Epub 2016 Feb 11. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016. PMID: 26866657 Free PMC article.
-
Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements.J Mem Lang. 2014 Feb 1;71(1):10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003. J Mem Lang. 2014. PMID: 24376304 Free PMC article.