Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Feb;116(1):133-51.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0582-4. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

Multislice CT in congenital bronchopulmonary malformations in children

[Article in English, Italian]
Affiliations
Review

Multislice CT in congenital bronchopulmonary malformations in children

[Article in English, Italian]
P Tomà et al. Radiol Med. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Congenital bronchopulmonary malformations encompass a wide spectrum of pathologies involving the lungs, trachea and bronchi, pulmonary vessels, and oesophagus. These developmental lesions are often isolated, but the association of two or more anomalies is not infrequent. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), thanks to multiplanar and 3D reconstructions, allows for detailed studies of these malformations, achieving better accuracy compared with conventional techniques such as chest X-ray, fluoroscopy, ventilation and perfusion scintigraphy and ultrasonography. MDCT is characterised by fast data acquisition and does not require sedation in the majority of cases. The main drawbacks of MDCT are the use of ionising radiation and - in many cases -contrast media. Recently, improved CT scanners and optimised CT protocols have made available to children all the benefits of MDCT, thanks to a significant reduction in radiation dose and an improved risk-benefit ratio. The aim of our paper was to evaluate MDCT in children with bronchopulmonary malformations by reporting our experience (about 2,400 studies in 30 months with a 64-slice MDCT scanner) and comparing it with the available literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pediatr Radiol. 2008 Jun;38(6):645-56 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):515-22 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Nov;187(5):W498-502 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2008 Jun;247(3):632-48 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23(4):291-5 - PubMed