Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Sep;24(3):436-45.
doi: 10.1037/a0019800.

Social cognitive mediators of adolescent smoking cessation: results from a large randomized intervention trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Social cognitive mediators of adolescent smoking cessation: results from a large randomized intervention trial

Jonathan B Bricker et al. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Only one prior study has examined why adolescent smoking cessation interventions are effective. To address this understudied and important issue, we examined whether a large adolescent smoking cessation intervention trial's outcomes were mediated by social cognitive theory processes. In a randomized trial (N = 2,151), counselors proactively delivered a telephone intervention to senior year high school smokers. Mediators and smoking status were self-reported at 12-months postintervention eligibility (88.8% retention). At least 6-months abstinence was the outcome. Among all enrolled smokers, increased self-efficacy to resist smoking in (a) social and (b) stressful situations together statistically mediated 55.6% of the intervention's effect on smoking cessation (p < .001). Among baseline daily smokers, increased self-efficacy to resist smoking in stressful situations statistically mediated 56.9% of the intervention's effect (p < .001). Self-efficacy to resist smoking is a possible mediator of the intervention's effect on smoking cessation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HS Study experimental design. Note. aOf the 901 (6.9%) who did not complete baseline survey: 524 (4.0%) absent/no reply, 377 (2.9%) declined. bTwenty-four smokers who declined further contact were excluded. cTrial participants who declined study participation post randomization.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, Donovan DM. Integrating skills training and motivational therapies. Implications for the treatment of substance dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;17(1–2):15–23. - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Branstetter SA, Horn K, Dino G, Zhang J. Beyond quitting: predictors of teen smoking cessation, reduction and acceleration following a school-based intervention. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2009;99(1–3):160–168. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2007. MMWR Morbidity &Mortality Weekly Report. 2008;57(SS-4):11–14. 37–38, 61–66. - PubMed

Publication types