Age differences in reading with distraction: sensory or inhibitory deficits?
- PMID: 20853960
- DOI: 10.1037/a0019508
Age differences in reading with distraction: sensory or inhibitory deficits?
Abstract
Two experiments examined how sensory acuity affects age differences in susceptibility to interference in the reading-with-distraction task. In both experiments, older and younger adults read texts in an italic font and were required to ignore distractor words in an upright font. Experiment 1 examined whether the age-related increase in distractibility can be simulated in younger adults by reducing their visual acuity. Experiment 2 investigated whether the age differences in distractibility disappear if visual acuity is equated across all participants in both age groups. Both experiments showed that an impairment in visual acuity leads to increased interference in the reading-with-distraction task. However, older adults were much more impaired by the distractor material than younger adults with reduced visual acuity (Experiment 1). The age differences in the reading-with-distraction task persisted when visual acuity was equated between older and younger adults (Experiment 2). We conclude that the age-related increase in susceptibility to interference in the reading-with-distraction task is not solely due to perceptual deficits of older adults but arises from a deficit in higher cognitive processes such as inhibitory attention. Nevertheless, sensory acuity has to be taken into account as a potential confounding factor in perceptually demanding visual attention tasks.
(c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects.Psychol Aging. 2008 Jun;23(2):377-91. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.377. Psychol Aging. 2008. PMID: 18573011
-
Aging and interference in story recall.Exp Aging Res. 2012;38(1):20-41. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2012.636724. Exp Aging Res. 2012. PMID: 22224948
-
Adult age differences in the access and deletion functions of inhibition.Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2008 May;15(3):330-57. doi: 10.1080/13825580701534601. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2008. PMID: 19230270
-
Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: costs and potential benefits.Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:353-63. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00022-2. Prog Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18394486 Review.
-
[Aging and cognitive slowing: example of attentional processes--evaluation procedures and related questions].Encephale. 2001 Jan-Feb;27(1):39-44. Encephale. 2001. PMID: 11294037 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.Exp Aging Res. 2016;42(3):221-63. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2016.1156964. Exp Aging Res. 2016. PMID: 27070044 Free PMC article.
-
Semantically- and Phonologically-Related Primes Improve Name Retrieval in Young and Older Adults.Lang Cogn Process. 2013 Jan 1;28(9):10.1080/01690965.2012.685481. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.685481. Lang Cogn Process. 2013. PMID: 24187413 Free PMC article.
-
Searching for interference effects in learning new face-name associations.Memory. 2012;20(2):155-66. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.649290. Epub 2012 Jan 31. Memory. 2012. PMID: 22292565 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources