A comparison of international occupational therapy competencies: implications for Australian standards in the new millennium
- PMID: 20854548
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00808.x
A comparison of international occupational therapy competencies: implications for Australian standards in the new millennium
Abstract
Background/aim: A timely evaluation of the Australian Competency Standards for Entry-Level Occupational Therapists (1994) was conducted. This thorough investigation comprised a literature review exploring the concept of competence and the applications of competency standards; systematic benchmarking of the Australian Occupational Therapy Competency Standards (OT AUSTRALIA, 1994) against other national and international competency standards and other affiliated documents, from occupational therapy and other cognate disciplines; and extensive nationwide consultation with the professional community. This paper explores and examines the similarities and disparities between occupational therapy competency standards documents available in English from Australia and other countries.
Methods: An online search for national occupational therapy competency standards located 10 documents, including the Australian competencies.
Results: Four 'frameworks' were created to categorise the documents according to their conceptual underpinnings: Technical-Prescriptive, Enabling, Educational and Meta-Cognitive. Other characteristics that appeared to impact the design, content and implementation of competency standards, including definitions of key concepts, authorship, national and cultural priorities, scope of services, intended use and review mechanisms, were revealed.
Conclusion: The proposed 'frameworks' and identification of influential characteristics provided a 'lens' through which to understand and evaluate competency standards. While consistent application of and attention to some of these characteristics appear to consolidate and affirm the authority of competency standards, it is suggested that the national context should be a critical determinant of the design and content of the final document. The Australian Occupational Therapy Competency Standards (OT AUSTRALIA, 1994) are critiqued accordingly, and preliminary recommendations for revision are proposed.
Similar articles
-
A national evaluation of the Australian Occupational Therapy Competency Standards (1994): a multistakeholder perspective.Aust Occup Ther J. 2009 Dec;56(6):384-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00794.x. Aust Occup Ther J. 2009. PMID: 20854549
-
Developing competency standards for occupational health nurses in Australia.AAOHN J. 1995 Mar;43(3):138-43. AAOHN J. 1995. PMID: 7702680
-
The development of national competency standards for the midwife in Australia.Midwifery. 2007 Dec;23(4):350-60. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.03.008. Epub 2006 Nov 27. Midwifery. 2007. PMID: 17125891
-
Professional guidelines in occupational health and ergonomics.Work. 2005;25(2):173-7. Work. 2005. PMID: 16131747 Review.
-
Conceptualising professionalism in occupational therapy through a Western lens.Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Jun;62(3):150-9. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12204. Epub 2015 May 29. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015. PMID: 26032014 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical commitment and competence: a qualitative study.J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020 Sep 28;13:14. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v13i14.4390. eCollection 2020. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020. PMID: 33532043 Free PMC article.
-
International approaches to paediatric podiatry curricula: It's the same, but different.J Foot Ankle Res. 2019 May 8;12:28. doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0339-9. eCollection 2019. J Foot Ankle Res. 2019. PMID: 31086569 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Canadian Pharmacy Education and Practice Standards with Accreditation Standards of the Canadian Pharmacy Residency Board.Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Nov-Dec;69(6):473-479. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i6.1611. Epub 2016 Dec 23. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016. PMID: 28123194 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources