Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;133(Pt 12):3625-34.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awq256. Epub 2010 Sep 20.

Mapping Go-No-Go performance within the subthalamic nucleus region

Affiliations

Mapping Go-No-Go performance within the subthalamic nucleus region

Tamara Hershey et al. Brain. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

The basal ganglia are thought to be important in the selection of wanted and the suppression of unwanted motor patterns according to explicit rules (i.e. response inhibition). The subthalamic nucleus has been hypothesized to play a particularly critical role in this function. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in individuals with Parkinson's disease has been used to test this hypothesis, but results have been variable. Based on current knowledge of the anatomical organization of the subthalamic nucleus, we propose that the location of the contacts used in deep brain stimulation could explain variability in the effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on response inhibition tasks. We hypothesized that stimulation affecting the dorsal subthalamic nucleus (connected to the motor cortex) would be more likely to affect motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, and stimulation affecting the ventral subthalamic nucleus (connected to higher order cortical regions) would be more likely to affect performance on a response inhibition task. We recruited 10 individuals with Parkinson's disease and bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus with one contact in the dorsal and another in the ventral subthalamic region on one side of the brain. Patients were tested with a Go-No-Go task and a motor rating scale in three conditions: stimulation off, unilateral dorsal stimulation and unilateral ventral stimulation. Both dorsal and ventral stimulation improved motor symptoms, but only ventral subthalamic stimulation affected Go-No-Go performance, decreasing hits and increasing false alarms, but not altering reaction times. These results suggest that the ventral subthalamic nucleus is involved in the balance between appropriate selection and inhibition of prepotent responses in cognitive paradigms, but that a wide area of the subthalamic nucleus region is involved in the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. This finding has implications for resolving inconsistencies in previous research, highlights the role of the ventral subthalamic nucleus region in response inhibition and suggests an approach for the clinical optimization of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for both motor and cognitive functions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Location of selected dorsal (green) and ventral (purple) contacts for the sample. Contacts on the left side of the brain have been flipped along the x-axis for display purposes. The STN is outlined in red. A 2 mm radius sphere was placed on each contact used. Scale bar indicates number of points (participants) within 2 mm of the voxel.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Effects of dorsal and ventral DBS on mean ± SEM contralateral UPDRS motor scores across DBS conditions. Asterisk indicates that UPDRS scores were greater in the off DBS than in the dorsal DBS and ventral DBS conditions. (B) Effects of dorsal and ventral DBS on response inhibition discriminability, Go and No-Go trials and discriminability. Asterisk indicates that ventral DBS was associated with decreased discriminability compared with the off DBS and dorsal DBS conditions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Individual subject’s discriminability scores for the differential effect of stimulation for ventral and dorsal DBS conditions. Negative numbers indicate worse performance in ventral than in dorsal conditions.

References

    1. Aron AR, Durston S, Eagle DM, Logan GD, Stinear CM, Stuphorn V. Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition. J Neurosci. 2007;27:11860–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aron AR, Poldrack RA. Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci. 2006;26:2424–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8:170–7. - PubMed
    1. Ballanger B, van Eimeren T, Moro E, Lozano AM, Hamani C, Boulinguez P, et al. Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and impulsivity: release your horses. Ann Neurol. 2009;66:817–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baunez C, Humby T, Eagle DM, Ryan LJ, Dunnett SB, Robbins TW. Effects of STN lesions on simple vs choice reaction time tasks in the rat: preserved motor readiness, but impaired response selection. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13:1609–16. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms