Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;34(1):84-9.
doi: 10.2337/dc10-1235. Epub 2010 Sep 20.

Performance of A1C for the classification and prediction of diabetes

Affiliations

Performance of A1C for the classification and prediction of diabetes

Elizabeth Selvin et al. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Although A1C is now recommended to diagnose diabetes, its test performance for diagnosis and prognosis is uncertain. Our objective was to assess the test performance of A1C against single and repeat glucose measurements for diagnosis of prevalent diabetes and for prediction of incident diabetes.

Research design and methods: We conducted population-based analyses of 12,485 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and a subpopulation of 691 participants in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) with repeat test results.

Results: Against a single fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl, the sensitivity and specificity of A1C ≥6.5% for detection of prevalent diabetes were 47 and 98%, respectively (area under the curve 0.892). Against repeated fasting glucose (3 years apart) ≥126 mg/dl, sensitivity improved to 67% and specificity remained high (97%) (AUC 0.936). Similar results were obtained in NHANES III against repeated fasting glucose 2 weeks apart. The accuracy of A1C was consistent across age, BMI, and race groups. For individuals with fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl and A1C ≥6.5% at baseline, the 10-year risk of diagnosed diabetes was 88% compared with 55% among those individuals with fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl and A1C 5.7-<6.5%.

Conclusions: A1C performs well as a diagnostic tool when diabetes definitions that most closely resemble those used in clinical practice are used as the "gold standard." The high risk of diabetes among individuals with both elevated fasting glucose and A1C suggests a dual role for fasting glucose and A1C for prediction of diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Area under the ROC curve for A1C (%) for the detection of glucose-based definitions of diabetes, the ARIC study (n = 12,485), adults without a history of diagnosed diabetes. ——, ROC curve for definition 1 (fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl at baseline), AUC 0.892; – – –, ROC curve for definition 2 (fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl on two separate occasions, 3 years apart), AUC 0.936.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ten-year risk of diagnosed diabetes (self-reported diagnosis or medication use) by baseline fasting glucose and/or A1C categories in the ARIC study, adults without a history of diagnosed diabetes (n = 12,485). A: 10-year risk of diagnosed diabetes by fasting glucose category at baseline. B: 10-year risk of diagnosed diabetes by A1C category at baseline. C: 10-year risk of diagnosed diabetes by A1C and fasting glucose categories at baseline. I bars are 95% CIs.

References

    1. International Expert Committee Report on the role of the a1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1327–1334 - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl. 1):S62–S69 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buell C, Kermah D, Davidson MB: Utility of A1C for diabetes screening in the 1999 2004 NHANES population. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2233–2235 - PubMed
    1. Davidson MB, Schriger DL, Peters AL, Lorber B: Relationship between fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin: potential for false-positive diagnoses of type 2 diabetes using new diagnostic criteria. JAMA 1999;281:1203–1210 - PubMed
    1. Rohlfing CL, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, England JD, Madsen R, Harris MI, Flegal KM, Eberhardt MS, Goldstein DE: Use of GHb (HbA1c) in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the U.S. population. Diabetes Care 2000;23:187–191 - PubMed

Publication types