Primary care practice transformation is hard work: insights from a 15-year developmental program of research
- PMID: 20856145
- PMCID: PMC3043156
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181cad65c
Primary care practice transformation is hard work: insights from a 15-year developmental program of research
Abstract
Background: Serious shortcomings remain in clinical care in the United States despite widespread use of improvement strategies for enhancing clinical performance based on knowledge transfer approaches. Recent calls to transform primary care practice to a patient-centered medical home present even greater challenges and require more effective approaches.
Methods: Our research team conducted a series of National Institutes of Health funded descriptive and intervention projects to understand organizational change in primary care practice settings, emphasizing a complexity science perspective. The result was a developmental research effort that enabled the identification of critical lessons relevant to enabling practice change.
Results: A summary of findings from a 15-year program of research highlights the limitations of viewing primary care practices in the mechanistic terms that underlie current or traditional approaches to quality improvement. A theoretical perspective that views primary care practices as dynamic complex adaptive systems with "agents" who have the capacity to learn, and the freedom to act in unpredictable ways provides a better framework for grounding quality improvement strategies. This framework strongly emphasizes that quality improvement interventions should not only use a complexity systems perspective, but also there is a need for continual reflection, careful tailoring of interventions, and ongoing attention to the quality of interactions among agents in the practice.
Conclusions: It is unlikely that current strategies for quality improvement will be successful in transforming current primary care practice to a patient-centered medical home without a stronger guiding theoretical foundation. Our work suggests that a theoretical framework guided by complexity science can help in the development of quality improvement strategies that will more effectively facilitate practice change.
Figures
References
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press; Washington, DC: 2001. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. - PubMed
-
- McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–2645. - PubMed
-
- Saaddine JB, Engelgau MM, Beckles GL, et al. A diabetes report card for the United States: quality of care in the 1990s. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:565–574. - PubMed
-
- Stange KC, Flocke SA, Goodwin MA, et al. Direct observation of rates of preventive service delivery in community family practice. Prev Med. 2000;31:167–176. - PubMed
-
- Katon WJ, Unutzer J, Simon G. Treatment of depression in primary care: where we are, where we can go. Med Care. 2004;42:1153–1157. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
