Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Feb;22(2):145-56.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1264-4. Epub 2010 Sep 21.

The original versus a modified inside-out transobturator procedure: 1-year results of a prospective randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The original versus a modified inside-out transobturator procedure: 1-year results of a prospective randomized trial

Jean de Leval et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of this study is to compare a modified inside-out transobturator procedure with its original counterpart [inside-out transobturator (TVT-O)] for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods: A prospective, randomized trial in women suffering from SUI was used. The modified procedure consisted of a shorter tape whilst the scissors or guide no longer perforated the obturator membrane. The primary outcome was the resolution of subjective and objective SUI at 1 year. Secondary outcome measures included adverse events, quality of life measures, and groin pain.

Results: One hundred seventy-five patients were randomized. No intraoperative complications were recorded. The SUI cure rate was 91.7% versus 90.7% (original versus modified, respectively; p = 0.824). Incidence and intensity of groin pain was higher in the original TVT-O group on day 0 and 1 (p < 0.05), requiring more analgesics (p = 0.015) but not thereafter.

Conclusions: At 1 year follow-up, the modified inside-out transobturator tape procedure was as efficient and safe as the original technique but associated with less immediate postoperative groin pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prog Urol. 1997 Feb;7(1):56-63 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Apr;19(4):577-82 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Feb;21(2):141-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):634.e1-5 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Aug;133(2):232-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources