FDG uptake in vaginal tampons is caused by urinary contamination and related to tampon position
- PMID: 20857098
- DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1618-7
FDG uptake in vaginal tampons is caused by urinary contamination and related to tampon position
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the aetiology of FDG uptake in vaginal tampons (VT), a known artefact in premenopausal women evaluated by PET/CT.
Methods: This Institutional Review Board approved study consisted of retrospective and prospective parts. The retrospective analysis included 685 women examined between January 2008 and December 2009 regarding VT presence. PET/CT images were analysed to determine the localization and the standardized uptake value (SUV) of VTs. We prospectively recruited 24 women (20-48 years old) referred for staging or follow-up in an oncology setting between February and April 2010, who were provided a commercial VT to be used during the entire examination after obtaining written informed consent. After image acquisition, VTs were individually analysed for creatinine concentration and blood traces. Statistical significance was tested with the Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: In the retrospective part, 38 of 685 women were found to have a VT of which 17 (45%) were FDG positive. A statistically significant correlation was found between FDG activity and VT position below the pubococcygeal line (PCL) (13 ± 11.2 mm). In the prospective study, 7 of 24 (29%) women had increased FDG activity in their VTs (SUV 18.8 ± 11 g/ml) but were not menstruating. FDG-positive VTs were significantly lower in position (14.6 ± 11.4 mm,below the PCL) than FDG-negative VTs (p = 0.039). The creatinine concentration was significantly increased in all seven positive VTs (931 ± 615 μmol/l).
Conclusion: FDG uptake in VTs is caused by urine contamination, which is likely related to localization below the PCL resulting in contact with urine during voiding.
Similar articles
-
Normal variants of bowel FDG uptake in dual-time-point PET/CT imaging.Ann Nucl Med. 2011 Apr;25(3):173-8. doi: 10.1007/s12149-010-0439-x. Epub 2010 Nov 19. Ann Nucl Med. 2011. PMID: 21088936
-
Intra-tumour 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity decreases the reliability on target volume definition with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jun;59(3):338-45. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12289. Epub 2015 Feb 23. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25708154
-
Does multidetector CT attenuation change in colon cancer liver metastases treated with 90Y help predict metabolic activity at FDG PET?Radiology. 2010 Apr;255(1):164-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09091028. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20308454
-
Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):3801-13. doi: 10.1118/1.4921363. Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 26133582 Free PMC article.
-
Hyperaccumulation of (18)F-FDG in order to differentiate solid pseudopapillary tumors from adenocarcinomas and from neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors and review of the literature.Hell J Nucl Med. 2013 May-Aug;16(2):97-102. doi: 10.1967/s002449910084. Epub 2013 May 20. Hell J Nucl Med. 2013. PMID: 23687644 Review.
Cited by
-
The utility of pharmacological and radiological interventions to optimize diagnostic information from PET/CT.Cancer Imaging. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00344-9. Cancer Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32962752 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous