Health care providers underestimate symptom intensities of cancer patients: a multicenter European study
- PMID: 20858248
- PMCID: PMC2949821
- DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-104
Health care providers underestimate symptom intensities of cancer patients: a multicenter European study
Abstract
Background: Many patients with advanced cancer depend upon health care providers for symptom assessment. The extent of agreement between patient and provider symptom assessments and the association of agreement with demographic- and disease-related factors was examined.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1933 patient-health care provider dyads, from 11 European countries. Patients reported symptoms by using the four-point scales of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3, and providers used corresponding four-point categorical scales. Level of agreement was addressed at the group level (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test), by difference scores (provider score minus patient score), at the individual level (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients, ICCs) and visually by Bland-Altman plots. Absolute numbers and chi-square tests were used to investigate the relationship between agreement and demographic-, as well as disease-related factors.
Results: The prevalence of symptoms assessed as moderate or severe by patients and providers, respectively, were for pain (67 vs.47%), fatigue (71 vs. 54%), generalized weakness (65 vs. 47%), anorexia (47 vs. 25%), depression (31 vs. 17%), constipation (45 vs. 30%), poor sleep (32 vs. 21%), dyspnea (30 vs. 16%), nausea (27 vs. 14%), vomiting (14 vs. 6%) and diarrhea (14 vs. 6%). Symptom scores were identical or differed by only one response category in the majority of patient-provider assessment pairs (79-93%). Providers underestimated the symptom in approximately one of ten patients and overestimated in 1% of patients. Agreement at the individual level was moderate (ICC 0.38 to 0.59). Patients with low Karnofsky Performance Status, high Mini Mental State-score, hospitalized, recently diagnosed or undergoing opioid titration were at increased risk of symptom underestimation by providers (all p < 0.001). Also, the agreement was significantly associated with drug abuse (p = 0.024), provider profession (p < 0.001), cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001) and country (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Considerable numbers of health care providers underestimated symptom intensities. Clinicians in cancer care should be aware of the factors characterizing patients at risk of symptom underestimation.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Patient self-reports of symptoms and clinician ratings as predictors of overall cancer survival.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Dec 21;103(24):1851-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr485. Epub 2011 Dec 7. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 22157640 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28. Oncology. 2008. PMID: 18758191
-
Cross-Sectional Patient-Reported Outcome Measuring of Health-Related Quality of Life With Establishment of Cancer- and Treatment-Specific Functional and Symptom Scales in Patients With Penile Cancer.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Dec;16(6):e1215-e1220. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.029. Epub 2018 Aug 11. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018. PMID: 30201215
-
Psychometric validation of the Moroccan version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in colorectal Cancer patients: cross-sectional study and systematic literature review.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07793-w. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33499819 Free PMC article.
-
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32483832 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of implementing a text-based symptom-monitoring program of endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer patients during treatment.Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3241-3254. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02660-w. Epub 2020 Oct 14. Qual Life Res. 2021. PMID: 33052514 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer patients' and clinicians' opinions on the best time in secondary care to approach patients for recruitment to longitudinal questionnaire-based research.Support Care Cancer. 2012 Dec;20(12):3365-72. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1518-4. Epub 2012 Jun 22. Support Care Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22722886
-
Population-level evidence of survival benefits of patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring software systems in routine cancer care.Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):7797-7799. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3480. Epub 2020 Oct 7. Cancer Med. 2020. PMID: 33029950 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Feb 8;36(4):240-251. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761607. eCollection 2023 Jul. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023. PMID: 37223227 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Russian nurses' readiness for transcultural care of palliative patients.BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jul 5;22(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01198-1. BMC Palliat Care. 2023. PMID: 37407991 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martin-Moreno JM, Harris M, Gorgojo L, Clark D, Normand C, Centeno C. European Parliament, eds. Policy Department, Economic and Scientific Policy. European Parliament's Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety; 2008. Palliative care in the European Union.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical