Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;95(12):5289-95.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1171. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

Identifying dysglycemic states in older adults: implications of the emerging use of hemoglobin A1c

Affiliations

Identifying dysglycemic states in older adults: implications of the emerging use of hemoglobin A1c

Kasia J Lipska et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Context: Hemoglobin A1c (A1c) was recently added to the diagnostic criteria for diabetes and prediabetes.

Objective: Our objective was to examine performance of A1c in comparison with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in diagnosing dysglycemia in older adults.

Design and setting: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition study at yr 4 (2000-2001) when FPG and standardized A1c measurements were available.

Participants: Of 3075 persons (aged 70-79 yr, 48% men, 42% Black) at study entry, 1865 participants without known diabetes who had appropriate measures were included.

Main outcome measures: Sensitivity and specificity of A1c-based diagnoses were compared with those based on FPG and the proportion of participants identified with dysglycemia by each measure.

Results: Of all participants, 2.7 and 3.1% had undiagnosed diabetes by FPG≥126 mg/dl and A1c≥6.5%, respectively. Among the remaining participants, 21.1% had prediabetes by impaired fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dl) and 22.2% by A1c≥5.7%. Roughly one third of individuals with diabetes and prediabetes were identified by either FPG or A1c alone and by both tests simultaneously. Sensitivities and specificities of A1c compared with FPG were 56.9 and 98.4% for diabetes and 47.0 and 84.5% for prediabetes, respectively. Blacks and women were more likely to be identified with dysglycemia by A1c than FPG.

Conclusions: In this older population, we found considerable discordance between FPG- and A1c-based diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes, with differences accentuated by race and gender. Broad implementation of A1c to diagnose dysglycemic states may substantially alter the epidemiology of these conditions in older Americans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Venn Diagrams for diabetes (A) and prediabetes (B). A, Individuals meeting criteria for diabetes (A1c ≥6.5%, FPG ≥126 mg/dl); B, individuals meeting criteria for prediabetes (IGH: A1c 5.7 to <6.5%; IFG: FPG 100 to <126 mg/dl).

Comment in

References

    1. International Expert Committee 2009 International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1c assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 32:1327–1334 - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association 2010 Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 33(Suppl 1):S62–S69 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pani LN, Korenda L, Meigs JB, Driver C, Chamany S, Fox CS, Sullivan L, D'Agostino RB, Nathan DM 2008 Effect of aging on A1c levels in individuals without diabetes. Diabetes Care 31:1991–1996 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herman WH, Ma Y, Uwaifo G, Haffner S, Kahn SE, Horton ES, Lachin JM, Montez MG, Brenneman T, Barrett-Connor E 2007 Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Differences in A1c by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care 30:2453–2457 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strotmeyer ES, de Rekeneire N, Schwartz AV, Faulkner KA, Resnick HE, Goodpaster BH, Shorr RI, Vinik AI, Harris TB, Newman AB 2008 The relationship of reduced peripheral nerve function and diabetes with physical performance in older white and Black adults. Diabetes Care 31:1767–1772 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types