Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
- PMID: 20862404
Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of platform switching on the biomechanical environment of implants in different placement and loading protocols.
Materials and methods: A computed tomography-based finite element model of a maxillary central incisor extraction socket was constructed containing a conical 13-mm external-hex implant with a 4.3-mm-diameter shoulder. Abutment models that were 4.3 mm and 3.8 mm in diameter were then imported and aligned to the implant. The 4.3-mm abutment edge matched perfectly the edge of the implant shoulder, while the 3.8-mm abutment assumed a platform-switching configuration. Then, immediately placed, immediately loaded, and osseointegrated (ie, conventional delayed loaded) protocols were simulated. Analysis of variance was used to interpret the data for peak equivalent strain (EQV strain) in the bone, bone-to-implant relative displacement, peak von Mises stress (EQV stress) in the abutment screw, and implant-abutment gap.
Results: In the same clinical situation, the differences in the values of the assessed results were minor for abutments of different diameters. In addition, no statistically significant influence of the abutment diameter was seen on any of the evaluated biomechanical parameters, except for the bone-to-implant displacement, although this was observed in a rather low percentage. Nevertheless, a slightly higher EQV stress in the abutment screw was seen in all cases for the 3.8-mm-diameter abutment, although this was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Within the limitation of this finite element analysis, it can be concluded that a circumferential horizontal mismatch of 0.5 mm does not make an important contribution to the biomechanical environment of implants. Also, there seems to be no significant biomechanical drawback to the design rationale of reducing the abutment diameter to move the implant-abutment gap area away from the implant-bone interface.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.J Periodontol. 2014 Sep;85(9):1161-71. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130633. Epub 2014 Mar 17. J Periodontol. 2014. PMID: 24635544
-
Influence of implant design on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants: computed tomography-based nonlinear three-dimensional finite element analysis.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):1279-87. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011. PMID: 22167434
-
Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):750-60. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4785. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016. PMID: 27447140
-
Effect of different impactor designs on biomechanical behavior in the interface bone-implant: A comparative biomechanics study.Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Dec;197:105723. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105723. Epub 2020 Aug 25. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020. PMID: 32877819 Review.
-
Prosthetic and biomechanical factors affecting bone remodeling around implants.Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013 Summer;8(2):314-33. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013. PMID: 23712348 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Current results and trends in platform switching.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011 Dec;8(Suppl 1):S30-6. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011. PMID: 23372593 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical effects of platform switching in two different implant systems: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.J Dent (Tehran). 2013 May;10(4):338-50. Epub 2013 May 31. J Dent (Tehran). 2013. PMID: 24396353 Free PMC article.
-
Three-Dimensional FEA Analysis of the Stress Distribution on Titanium and Graphene Frameworks Supported by 3 or 6-Implant Models.Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Jan 1;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8010015. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36648801 Free PMC article.
-
Platform switching on wide-diameter external hex implants: a finite element analysis.J Clin Exp Dent. 2013 Apr 1;5(2):e77-82. doi: 10.4317/jced.50991. eCollection 2013 Apr 1. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013. PMID: 24455061 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of platform switching on crestal bone levels around implants in the posterior mandible: 3 years results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Apr;43(4):374-82. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12522. Epub 2016 Mar 30. J Clin Periodontol. 2016. PMID: 26847169 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous