Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct 15;82(20):8510-8.
doi: 10.1021/ac101388b.

Integrated post-experiment monoisotopic mass refinement: an integrated approach to accurately assign monoisotopic precursor masses to tandem mass spectrometric data

Affiliations

Integrated post-experiment monoisotopic mass refinement: an integrated approach to accurately assign monoisotopic precursor masses to tandem mass spectrometric data

Hee-Jung Jung et al. Anal Chem. .

Abstract

Accurate assignment of monoisotopic precursor masses to tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) data is a fundamental and critically important step for successful peptide identifications in mass spectrometry based proteomics. Here we describe an integrated approach that combines three previously reported methods of treating MS/MS data for precursor mass refinement. This combined method, "integrated post-experiment monoisotopic mass refinement" (iPE-MMR), integrates steps (1) generation of refined MS/MS data by DeconMSn; (2) additional refinement of the resultant MS/MS data by a modified version of PE-MMR; and (3) elimination of systematic errors of precursor masses using DtaRefinery. iPE-MMR is the first method that utilizes all MS information from multiple MS scans of a precursor ion including multiple charge states, in an MS scan, to determine precursor mass. With the combination of these methods, iPE-MMR increases sensitivity in peptide identification and provides increased accuracy when applied to complex high-throughput proteomics data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Overall data flow chart of iPE-MMR pipeline. (B) An expanded flow chart of the dotted box of Figure 1a.
Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Overall data flow chart of iPE-MMR pipeline. (B) An expanded flow chart of the dotted box of Figure 1a.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Improvement in sensitivity and accuracy of peptide identifications by iPE-MMR. (A) Comparison of number of unique peptide identifications from different methods. (B) Comparison of mass measurement accuracy (MMA) distributions of peptide identifications from different methods. (C) Comparison of distributions of peptide-spectral matches from different methods.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Examples of improved peptide identifications after iPE-MMR. (A) The annotated spectrum of Extract_MSn generated DTA. The resultant peptide identification was a reverse sequence peptide. (B) The annotated spectrum of the iPE-MMR generated DTA using the same DTA. The precursor mass was replaced by a UMC mass that was ca. 1 Da smaller. (C) The annotated MS/MS spectrum after DeconMSn. (D) The annotated MS/MS spectrum of the same DTA but after iPE-MMR.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Mass extracted chromatogram of +2 state precursor ions. (B) A spectral summed MS spectrum of the +2 charge state. (C) An annotated MS/MS spectrum of the +2 charge state ion using a DTA mass of 2792.4337. (D) An annotated MS/MS spectrum of the +2 charge state ion after correcting the DTA mass by −1.00235 Da. (E) Mass extracted chromatogram of the +3 state precursor ions. (F) A spectral summed MS spectrum of the +3 charge state. (G) An annotated MS/MS spectrum of a +3 charge state ion using DeconMSn generated DTA. ○ denotes theoretical abundances of the corresponding peptide.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of plots of mass differential (DelM) versus SEQUEST Xcorr for filtered peptide identification from Extract_MSn generated DTAs (A), iPE-MMR generated DTAs (B), and iPE-MMR generated DTAs with consideration of deamidation (C). Static filters used: ΔCn ≥0.1, Xcorr≥1.9 for +1 peptides, Xcorr≥2.2 for +2 peptides, Xcorr≥3.2 for ≥+3 peptides. Comparison of mass measurement accuracy distributions around each unit bin of DelM of Extract_MSn generated DTAs (D), iPE-MMR generated DTAs (E), and iPE-MMR generated DTAs with consideration of deamidation (F). The numbers are the amount of non-redundant peptide identifications within ±10 ppm of DelM = 0, 1, 2. Peptide identifications around other DelM were not considered as they exhibited complete randomness. For clarity, MS/MS data from the 50% salt fraction was used for this figure.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Mass extracted chromatogram of a +2 precursor ion. (B) An averaged isotopic distribution of the corresponding precursor ion. ○ denotes the theoretical isotopic distribution of the predicted peptide (R.NMIIVPEMIGSVVGIYN#GK.A, #=deamidation). (C) Peptide identification without consideration of deamidation. (D) Peptide identification with consideration of deamidation.

References

    1. Shin B, Jung H-J, Hyung S-W, Kim H, Lee D, Lee C, Yu M-H, Lee S-W. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2008;7:1124–1134. - PubMed
    1. Luethy R, Kessner DE, Katz JE, McLean B, Grothe R, Kani K, Faca V, Pitteri S, Hanash S, Agus DB, Mallick P. J. Proteome Res. 2008;7:4031–4039. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hsieh EJ, Hoopmann MR, MacLean B, MacCoss MJ. J. Proteome Res. 2010;9:1138–1143. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beausoleil SA, Villen J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006;24:1285–1292. - PubMed
    1. Bakalarski CE, Haas W, Dephoure NE, Gygi SP. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007;389:1409–1419. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources