Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;34(1):39-43.
doi: 10.2337/dc10-0415. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

How many sonograms are needed to reliably predict the absence of fetal overgrowth in gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies?

Affiliations

How many sonograms are needed to reliably predict the absence of fetal overgrowth in gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies?

Ute M Schaefer-Graf et al. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Serial measurements of the fetal abdominal circumference have been used to guide metabolic management of pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). A reduction in the number of repeat ultrasound examinations would save resources. Our purpose was to determine the number of serial abdominal circumference measurements per patient necessary to reliably predict the absence of fetal overgrowth.

Research design and methods: Women who had GDM were asked to return for repeat ultrasound at 3- to 4-week intervals starting at initiation of care (mean 26.9 ± 5.7 weeks). Maternal risk factors associated with fetal overgrowth were determined.

Results: A total of 4,478 ultrasound examinations were performed on 1,914 subjects (2.3 ± 1.2 per pregnancy). Of the 518 women with fetal abdominal circumference >90th percentile, it was diagnosed in 73.9% with the first ultrasound examination at entry and in 13.1% with the second ultrasound examination. Of the fetuses, 85.9 and 86.9% of the fetuses were born non-large for gestational age (LGA) when abdominal circumference was <90th percentile at 24-27 weeks and 28-32 weeks, respectively, and 88.0% were born non-LGA when both scans showed normal growth. For those women who had no risk factors for fetal overgrowth (risk factors: BMI >30 kg/m², history of macrosomia, and fasting glucose > 100 mg/dl), the accuracy of prediction of a non-LGA neonate was 90.0, 89.5, and 95.2%. The predictive ability did not increase with more than two normal scans.

Conclusions: The yield of sonographic diagnosis of a large fetus drops markedly after the finding of a fetal abdominal circumference <90th percentile on two sonograms, which excludes with high reliability the risk of a LGA newborn. The ability was enhanced in women who had no risk factors for neonatal macrosomia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A: Cumulative detection rate of an abdominal circumference ≥90th percentile in all 518 pregnancies with at least one event of fetal abdominal circumference >90th percentile according to the number of the scan when abdominal circumference >90th percentile was diagnosed for the first time (50.4% had two, 26.3% had three, 15.3% had four, and 8.1% had five or six ultrasound examinations). B: Rate of non-LGA newborns (sensitivity) according to number of scans with abdominal circumference <90th percentile. Data are given for the total population and for women with and without maternal risk factors (RF).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Metzger B, Buchanan T, Coustan D, De Leiva A, Dunger D, Hod M, Kitzmiller J, Kjos S, Oats J, Pettitt D, Sacks D, Zoupas C: Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2007;30(Suppl.):S251–S260 - PubMed
    1. Sacks DA, Chen W: Estimating fetal weight in the management of macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55:229–239 - PubMed
    1. Jazayeri A, Heffron JA, Phillips R, Spellacy WN: Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:523–526 - PubMed
    1. De Reu PA, Smits LJ, Oosterbaan HP, Nijhuis JG: Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population. J Perinat Med 2008;36:324–329 - PubMed
    1. Bochner CJ, Medearis AL, Williams J, 3rd, Castro L, Hobel CJ, Wade ME: Early third-trimester ultrasound screening in gestational diabetes to determine the risk of macrosomia and labor dystocia at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:703–708 - PubMed