Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug 9:1:45-53.
doi: 10.2147/clep.s4782.

Association of Apgar scores with death and neurologic disability

Affiliations

Association of Apgar scores with death and neurologic disability

Vera Ehrenstein. Clin Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Apgar score was devised with the aim to standardize the assessment of newborns. It has been used worldwide to evaluate infants' condition immediately after birth, to determine their need for resuscitation, and to evaluate the effectiveness of resuscitation. Apgar score was never intended for prediction of outcome beyond the immediate postnatal period; however, since low scores correlate with prenatal and perinatal adversities, multiple studies have examined the relation between the value of Apgar score and duration of low (<7) Apgar score and subsequent death or neurologic disability. This article reviews such studies. The author concludes that the overall evidence shows consistent association of low Apgar scores with increased risks of neonatal and infant death and with neurologic disability, including cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and cognitive impairment. Dose-response patterns have been shown for the value of Apgar score and duration of low score and the outcomes of mortality and neurologic disability. The association of Apgar score <7 at five minutes with increased risks of neurologic disability seems to persist many years postnatally. Some corresponding relative risk estimates are large (eg, four to seven for epilepsy or more than 20 for cerebral palsy), while others are modest (eg, 1.33 for impaired cognitive function). The absolute risks, however, are low (<5% in for most neurologic conditions), and majority of surviving babies with low Apgar scores grow up without disability. The low magnitude of absolute risks makes Apgar score a poor clinical predictor of long-term outcome. Nevertheless, the observed associations point to the importance of fetal and perinatal periods for neurodevelopment.

Keywords: Apgar score; epidemiology; neonatal death; neurologic disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dr Virginia Apgar holds a newborn baby upside-down to test its reflex irritability – one of the five Apgar score items (1959). Copyright © 2009. Reproduced with permission. Series 6 of the L. Stanley James Papers (MS 0782) in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and Special Collections. Available from: http://mtholyoke.cdmhost.com/u?/p1030coll8,3155.

References

    1. Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953;32:260–267. - PubMed
    1. Apgar V. The newborn (Apgar) scoring system. Reflections and advice. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1966;13(3):645–650. - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 333, May 2006 (replaces No. 174, July 1996): The Apgar score. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):1209–1212. - PubMed
    1. Apgar V, Holaday DA, James LS, Weisbrot IM, Berrien C. Evaluation of the newborn infant; second report. JAMA. 1958;168:1985–1988. - PubMed
    1. Crawford JS, Davies P, Pearson JF. Significance of the individual components of the Apgar score. Br J Anaesth. 1973;45(2):148–158. - PubMed