Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug 9:1:75-92.
doi: 10.2147/clep.s4775.

Improving reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systematic review

Mariam Molokhia  1 , Shivani Tanna, Derek Bell
Affiliations

Improving reporting of adverse drug reactions: Systematic review

Mariam Molokhia et al. Clin Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, with many being identified post-marketing. Improvement in current ADR reporting, including utility of underused or innovative methods, is crucial to improve patient safety and public health.

Objectives: To evaluate methods to improve ADR reporting via a systematic literature review.

Methods: Data sources were Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and National Library for health searches on ADR reporting (January 1997 to August 2007) including cross-referenced articles. Twenty-four out of 260 eligible studies were identified and critically assessed. Studies were grouped as follows: i) spontaneous reporting (11); ii) medical chart/note review (2); iii) patient interviews/questionnaires (3); and iv) combination methods including computer-assisted methods (8).

Results: Using computerized monitoring systems (CMS) to generate signals associated with changes in laboratory results with other methods can improve ADR reporting. Educational interventions combined with reminders and/or prescription card reports can improve hospital-based ADR reporting, and showed short to medium term improvement.

Conclusions: The use of electronic health data combined with other methods for ADR reporting can improve efficiency and accuracy for detecting ADRs and can be extended to other health care settings. Although methods with educational intervention appear to be effective, few studies have reviewed long-term effects to assess if the improvements can be sustained.

Keywords: ADR; adverse drug reaction; reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Article selection process for systematic review on ADR reporting. Abbreviations: ADR, adverse drug reactions; CMS, computerized monitoring systems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization . International drug monitoring: The Role of National Centres Report No: 498. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1972. - PubMed
    1. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):15–19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279(15):1200–1205. - PubMed
    1. Patel H, Bell D, Molokhia M, Srishanmuganathan J, Patel M, Car J, et al. Trends in hospital admissions for adverse drug reactions in England: analysis of national hospital episode statistics 1998–2005. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2007;7(1):9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death [NCEPOD] For better, for worse? A review of the care of patients who died within 30 days of receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy 2008. Cited February 3, 2009. Available from: http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2008sact.htm