Effects of a lower-body exoskeleton device on metabolic cost and gait biomechanics during load carriage
- PMID: 20865609
- DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.512982
Effects of a lower-body exoskeleton device on metabolic cost and gait biomechanics during load carriage
Abstract
This study investigated the effects on metabolic cost and gait biomechanics of using a prototype lower-body exoskeleton (EXO) to carry loads. Nine US Army participants walked at 1.34 m/s on a 0% grade for 8 min carrying military loads of 20 kg, 40 kg and 55 kg with and without the EXO. Mean oxygen consumption (VO(2)) scaled to body mass and scaled to total mass were significantly higher, by 60% and 41% respectively, when the EXO was worn, compared with the control condition. Mean VO(2) and mean VO(2) scaled to body mass significantly increased with load. The kinematic and kinetic data revealed significant differences between EXO and control conditions, such as walking with a more flexed posture and braking with higher ground reaction force at heel strike when wearing the EXO. Study findings demonstrate that the EXO increased users' metabolic cost while carrying various loads and altered their gait biomechanics compared with conventional load carriage. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: An EXO designed to assist in load bearing was found to raise energy expenditure substantially when tested by soldiers carrying military loads. EXO weight, weight distribution and design elements that altered users' walking biomechanics contributed to the high energy cost. To realise the potential of EXOs, focus on the user must accompany engineering advances.
Similar articles
-
Effects of military load carriage on kinematics of gait.Ergonomics. 2010 Jun;53(6):782-91. doi: 10.1080/00140131003672015. Ergonomics. 2010. PMID: 20496244
-
Energy cost and mechanical work of walking during load carriage in soldiers.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jun;44(6):1131-40. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182456057. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012. PMID: 22215177
-
Ergonomic effects of load carriage on the upper and lower back on metabolic energy cost of walking.Appl Ergon. 2008 May;39(3):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.07.001. Epub 2007 Sep 11. Appl Ergon. 2008. PMID: 17850760
-
Biomechanics of Load Carriage--Historical Perspectives and Recent Insights.J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29 Suppl 11:S129-33. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001031. J Strength Cond Res. 2015. PMID: 26506175 Review.
-
Soldier load carriage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects.Mil Med. 2004 Jan;169(1):45-56. doi: 10.7205/milmed.169.1.45. Mil Med. 2004. PMID: 14964502 Review.
Cited by
-
Exoskeletal solutions to enable mobility with a lower leg fracture in austere environments.Wearable Technol. 2023 Feb 28;4:e5. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2022.26. eCollection 2023. Wearable Technol. 2023. PMID: 38487779 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does a Passive Unilateral Lower Limb Exoskeleton Affect Human Static and Dynamic Balance Control?Front Sports Act Living. 2019 Sep 20;1:22. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00022. eCollection 2019. Front Sports Act Living. 2019. PMID: 33344946 Free PMC article.
-
The Effects of Wearable Resistance Training on Metabolic, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables During Walking, Running, Sprint Running and Jumping: A Systematic Review.Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):887-906. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0622-x. Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 27638041
-
Influence of Power Delivery Timing on the Energetics and Biomechanics of Humans Wearing a Hip Exoskeleton.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017 Mar 8;5:4. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00004. eCollection 2017. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017. PMID: 28337434 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing optimized exoskeleton assistance of the hip, knee, and ankle in single and multi-joint configurations.Wearable Technol. 2021 Nov 24;2:e16. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2021.14. eCollection 2021. Wearable Technol. 2021. PMID: 38486633 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials