Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;64(5):1426-31.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.22450.

Multicomponent T2* mapping of knee cartilage: technical feasibility ex vivo

Affiliations

Multicomponent T2* mapping of knee cartilage: technical feasibility ex vivo

Yongxian Qian et al. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Disorganization of collagen fibers is a sign of early-stage cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritic knees. Water molecules trapped within well-organized collagen fibrils would be sensitive to collagen alterations. Multicomponent effective transverse relaxation (T2*) mapping with ultrashort echo time acquisitions is here proposed to probe short T(2) relaxations in those trapped water molecules. Six human tibial plateau explants were scanned on a 3T MRI scanner using a home-developed ultrashort echo time sequence with echo times optimized via Monte Carlo simulations. Time constants and component intensities of T2* decays were calculated at individual pixels, using the nonnegative least squares algorithm. Four T2*-decay types were found: 99% of cartilage pixels having mono-, bi-, or nonexponential decay, and 1% showing triexponential decay. Short T2* was mainly in 1-6 ms, while long T2* was ∼ 22 ms. A map of decay types presented spatial distribution of these T2* decays. These results showed the technical feasibility of multicomponent T2* mapping on human knee cartilage explants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Monte Carlo simulations for bi-component T2* fitting: long T2*=(30ms, 75%), short T2* =(1/2/3ms, 25%); SNR (at TE=0ms) =286 (noise_1), 143 (noise_2) or 95 (noise_3); noise trials=500; Type-1 (9-TE) (ms) = (0.5, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 7, 10, 20, 30, 40), Type-2 (11-TE) (ms) = (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 20, 30, 40). a-c) For short T2* at 1, 2, and 3ms, Type-2 (11-TE) produced smaller SD values than Type-1 (9-TE) when T2* became shorter from 3 to 1ms. d-e) For a long T2* at 30ms, the SD values are less than 7% at all the three SNR levels for both Type-1 and Type-2. Note: in c) the mean and SD at noise_3 were excluded due to large SD value.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Four typical decay curves found in our cartilage images with UTE acquisitions: mono-, bi-, tri-, and non-exponential decays. These decay curves were differentiated primarily in the first 10ms and became mono-exp decay thereafter.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Multi-component T2* mapping of a human tibial cartilage (asymptomatic, 18 yrs old, male): a) Cartilage image at TE=0.5ms (fat saturated, awsos sequence, resolution=0.39mm), b) Conventional T2* map of the cartilage (mono-exp fitting, 11-TE), c) Multi-component T2* decay map of the cartilage (multi-component exp fitting, 11-TE), and d) Distribution of pixel number over the four recognized types of T2* decays. The multi-component T2* decay map in c) unveiled more detailed spatial variations of T2* relaxation in the cartilage than the single-component T2* map in b). Almost all the cartilage pixels (99%) had decays of mono-, bi-, or non-exp type.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A 2D plot of global averages of T2* relaxation time and intensity of the investigated cartilages with three asymptomatic/healthy (green, shadow at HTP-5) and three diseased (red): a) Short-T2* component from multi-component exponential fitting, b) Long-T2* component, and c) Single-component from conventional mono-exponential fitting. The short-T2* component differentiated the diseased cartilages from the asymptomatic ones, while the long-T2* component or single-component did not. The percent intensities are not added up to 100 because they are averages instead of values at individual pixels.

References

    1. Blumenkrantz G, Majumdar S. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Eur Cell Mater. 2007;13:75–86. - PubMed
    1. Lattanzio PJ, Marshall KW, Damyanovich AZ, Peemoeller H. Macromolecule and water magnetization exchange modeling in articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:840–851. - PubMed
    1. Lohmander LS. Markers of altered metabolism in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2004;70:28–35. - PubMed
    1. Gay S, Miller EJ. Semper bonis artibus. Gustav Fischer Verlag; Germany: 1978. Collagen in the physiology and pathology of connective tissue; p. 109.
    1. Burstein D, Velyvis J, Scott KT, Stock KW, Kim YJ, Jaramillo D, Boutin RD, Gray ML. Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:36–41. - PubMed

Publication types