Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Oct;56(4):362-373.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.013.

Accuracy and quality of clinical decision rules for syncope in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Luis A Serrano  1 , Erik P Hess, M Fernanda Bellolio, Mohammed H Murad, Victor M Montori, Patricia J Erwin, Wyatt W Decker
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Accuracy and quality of clinical decision rules for syncope in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Luis A Serrano et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Study objective: We assess the methodological quality and prognostic accuracy of clinical decision rules in emergency department (ED) syncope patients.

Methods: We searched 6 electronic databases, reviewed reference lists of included studies, and contacted content experts to identify articles for review. Studies that derived or validated clinical decision rules in ED syncope patients were included. Two reviewers independently screened records for relevance, selected studies for inclusion, assessed study quality, and abstracted data. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool diagnostic performance estimates across studies that derived or validated the same clinical decision rule. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with the I(2) statistic, and subgroup hypotheses were tested with a test of interaction.

Results: We identified 18 eligible studies. Deficiencies in outcome (blinding) and interrater reliability assessment were the most common methodological weaknesses. Meta-analysis of the San Francisco Syncope Rule (sensitivity 86% [95% confidence interval {CI} 83% to 89%]; specificity 49% [95% CI 48% to 51%]) and the Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio risk score (sensitivity 95% [95% CI 88% to 98%]; specificity 31% [95% CI 29% to 34%]). Subgroup analysis identified study design (prospective, diagnostic odds ratio 8.82 [95% CI 3.5 to 22] versus retrospective, diagnostic odds ratio 2.45 [95% CI 0.96 to 6.21]) and ECG determination (by evaluating physician, diagnostic odds ratio 25.5 [95% CI 4.41 to 148] versus researcher or cardiologist, diagnostic odds ratio 4 [95% CI 2.15 to 7.55]) as potential explanations for the variability in San Francisco Syncope Rule performance.

Conclusion: The methodological quality and prognostic accuracy of clinical decision rules for syncope are limited. Differences in study design and ECG interpretation may account for the variable prognostic performance of the San Francisco Syncope Rule when validated in different practice settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study selection process
Figure 2
Figure 2. Methodological quality assesment of derivation studies (n= 9)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Methodological quality assessment of validation studies (n= 13)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) European heart journal. 2009 Aug 27; - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huff JS, Decker WW, Quinn JV, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2007;33(6):e1–e17. - PubMed
    1. Alshekhlee A, Shen WK, Mackall J, et al. Incidence and mortality rates of syncope in the United States. The American journal of medicine. 2009 Feb;122(2):181–188. - PubMed
    1. Blanc JJ, L'Her C, Gosselin G, et al. Prospective evaluation of an educational programme for physicians involved in the management of syncope. Europace. 2005;7(4):400–406. - PubMed
    1. Quinn J, McDermott D, Stiell I, et al. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 May;47(5):448–454. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms